Kevin SaundersonKevin Saunderson Live @TIMEWARP 2012

    Classics · 60 min · analysed 18 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    64/100
    Level
    developing
    Duration
    60 min
    Genre
    Classics

    About this classics set

    Kevin Saunderson Live @TIMEWARP 2012 is a classics DJ set by Kevin Saunderson, running 60 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 64/100 overall — developing.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This is the sound of a DJ who doesn't just play tracks, but builds a machine-driven ecosystem.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 79/100.

    The final score is capped by measured bm: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 12 points, moving between 70 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 420.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 30 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This is the sound of a DJ who doesn't just play tracks, but builds a machine-driven ecosystem.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured62
    Transition Qualitymeasured84
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured93
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI93
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI85
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI93
    PayoffAI92

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%81
    Energy Curvemeasured78
    PacingAI91
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI87
    Energy HandoffAI92
    Fatigue ControlAI15

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%79
    Unexpected MomentsAI83
    ContrastAI80
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI91
    FreshnessAI14
    Surprise ControlAI83

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%95
    Selection QualityAI94
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI86
    SignatureAI96

    Final score capped by measured execution (bm) — weighted average was 85.

    Energy arc

    0:0036:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    2:45

    Long percussive blend with low-end swap

    Seamless transition that maintains the rolling momentum perfectly.

    90
    5:42

    Quick EQ swap on the mids

    Slightly abrupt mid-frequency shift, but energy is preserved.

    78
    9:45

    Filter sweep into a drop swap

    Masterful use of tension and release to introduce the next chapter.

    92
    14:50

    Perfect Blend

    100
    20:15

    Minor EQ Overlap

    intentional_reset

    82
    26:12

    Long percussive blend with low-end swap

    Classic Detroit layering. The incoming track's hats are introduced early, creating a 32-bar bridge that feels like a single track.

    90

    Technical subscores

    85

    EQ balance

    91

    Beat alignment

    91

    Energy control

    93

    Tempo stability

    86

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    79

    Harmonic compatibility

    84

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    29.5 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    200.6 ms

    Drift p95

    3,569

    Boundaries detected

    37

    Hard cuts / h

    137

    Clipping events

    86

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (2×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (28:00, 34:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    • Beat alignment needs work — typical drift of 30 ms

      Measured median beat-grid drift is 30 ms across the transitions. Reference: pro ≤ 25 ms, needs work 30-42 ms, must be reworked > 42 ms. Above ~30 ms the kick flams and dancers feel the blend slipping.

    Timeline

    • 4:15Groove Lock
    • 8:30Energy Peak
    • 5:42Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 28:15Groove Lock Peak
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Kevin Saunderson's Kevin Saunderson Live @TIMEWARP 2012 get?
    Kevin Saunderson Live @TIMEWARP 2012 scores 64/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Kevin Saunderson Live @TIMEWARP 2012?
    The analysed recording runs 60 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 79/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Kevin Saunderson sets analysed

    Similar classics sets

    All Kevin Saunderson analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.