Kevin SaundersonKevin Saunderson LIVE on Mixify - May 14, 2013 - FULL SET

    Classics · 1h 01m · analysed 18 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    87/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 01m
    Genre
    Classics

    About this classics set

    Kevin Saunderson LIVE on Mixify - May 14, 2013 - FULL SET is a classics DJ set by Kevin Saunderson, running 1h 01m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This mix is a masterclass in Detroit techno efficiency, where every percussive layer serves the relentless forward motion of the groove.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 83/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 34 points, moving between 82 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 382.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 23 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This mix is a masterclass in Detroit techno efficiency, where every percussive layer serves the relentless forward motion of the groove.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured77
    Transition Qualitymeasured75
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured90
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured67

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%91
    Narrative ArcAI95
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI86
    Section AwarenessAI91
    Flow ContinuityAI95
    PayoffAI91

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%91
    Energy Curvemeasured85
    PacingAI93
    MomentumAI96
    Peak ManagementAI91
    Energy HandoffAI91
    Fatigue ControlAI87

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%87
    Unexpected MomentsAI83
    ContrastAI84
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI90
    FreshnessAI87
    Surprise ControlAI83

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%95
    Selection QualityAI94
    Identity ConsistencyAI99
    IntentionalityAI97
    ConfidenceAI96
    RestraintAI89
    SignatureAI97

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 89.

    Energy arc

    0:0060:45

    Transitions analysed (7)

    2:08

    Long percussive blend

    Seamless integration of new drum layers over the existing groove.

    92
    7:15

    EQ-focused swap

    Sharp transition into industrial textures, maintaining high energy.

    88
    10:45

    Long percussive blend with high-pass filtering

    Perfectly phase-locked transition that maintains the industrial drive.

    92
    14:42

    Quick EQ swap on the downbeat

    A slight energy bump during the swap, likely intentional to reset the groove.

    85
    20:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    A textbook Detroit blend. The transition is almost imperceptible as the new percussive layers weave in.

    88
    24:12

    Phrase-perfect vocal introduction

    Excellent timing. The vocal track enters exactly on the 32-bar mark, instantly elevating the energy.

    92
    28:55

    Filter-assisted blend

    Smooth transition using a high-pass filter on the outgoing track to make room for the new kick.

    84

    Technical subscores

    90

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    92

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    88

    Loudness control

    94

    Musical coherence

    83

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    23.4 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    202.1 ms

    Drift p95

    3,652

    Boundaries detected

    75

    Hard cuts / h

    31

    Clipping events

    149

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (7:15, 14:42).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 16:00, 31:00, 37:00, 41:00, 48:45). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:05The Hook
    • 4:42Energy Shift
    • 12:15Groove Lock Peak
    • 17:30Tension Plateau
    • 14:42Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 24:30Vocal Peak
    • 27:15Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Maintain this level of percussive precision; it is your strongest asset.
    • Consider introducing a brief melodic breakdown around the 20-minute mark to provide a 'reset' for the audience.
    • Experiment with more aggressive filter sweeps during transitions to add a layer of performance flair.
    • Experiment with longer, more melodic breakdowns to create contrast.
    • Use more creative EQ filtering to add movement to static loops.
    • Incorporate occasional vocal snippets to increase crowd engagement.
    • Maintain the long, patient blends; they are a hallmark of your style.
    • Continue using iconic vocal hooks to punctuate the energy peaks.
    • Experiment with subtle melodic layers to add another dimension to the industrial sound.
    • Ensure level consistency when introducing high-energy percussive elements.
    • Smooth out abrupt transitions like the one at 40:15 with subtle filter work.
    • Introduce a brief melodic or atmospheric break to reset tension before the final peak.
    • Experiment with more dramatic filter releases to enhance the impact of drops.
    • Ensure master levels are carefully monitored during intense percussive layering.
    • Continue to leverage long, subtle blends to maintain the hypnotic state.
    • Consider introducing a brief melodic element to provide a narrative contrast.
    • Experiment with micro-breakdowns to further enhance the impact of the driving kicks.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Kevin Saunderson's Kevin Saunderson LIVE on Mixify - May 14, 2013 - FULL SET get?
    Kevin Saunderson LIVE on Mixify - May 14, 2013 - FULL SET scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Kevin Saunderson LIVE on Mixify - May 14, 2013 - FULL SET?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 01m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 83/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Kevin Saunderson sets analysed

    Similar classics sets

    All Kevin Saunderson analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.