Kevin de Vries — Kevin De Vries | Loveland Festival 2019 | LL111

    Melodic Techno · 2h 06m · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    86/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 06m
    Genre
    Melodic Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Kevin de Vries.

    In short

    Kevin De Vries | Loveland Festival 2019 | LL111 by Kevin de Vries scores 86/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (83/100).

    The DJ's ability to maintain a relentless drive while introducing subtle emotional layers is what sets this performance apart.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (13:00, 19:00, 34:00, 44:00, 46:00, 50:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with brief, high-impact melodic breakdowns.
    • Incorporate more rhythmic syncopation to vary the groove.
    • Use vocal elements sparingly to add a human touch to the cinematic soundscape.
    • Continue to refine the balance between raw energy and melodic depth.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 5:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 5:45

      A textbook techno transition. The incoming track's sub-bass is introduced so subtly it feels like a natural evolution of the first track.

    • 10:12Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 10:12

      Effective use of filtering to clear space for the next track's lead elements.

    • 11:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 11:45

      Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the groove while introducing new melodic textures.

    • 18:20Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 18:20

      Smooth energy handoff using filtering to clear space for the new track's transients.

    About this melodic techno set

    Kevin De Vries | Loveland Festival 2019 | LL111 is a melodic techno DJ set by Kevin de Vries, running 2h 06m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ's ability to maintain a relentless drive while introducing subtle emotional layers is what sets this performance apart.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 61 points, moving between 20 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 386.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The DJ's ability to maintain a relentless drive while introducing subtle emotional layers is what sets this performance apart.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%84
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured63
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured88
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI89
    Tension & ReleaseAI87
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI91

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%87
    Energy Curvemeasured87
    PacingAI90
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI88
    Energy HandoffAI89
    Fatigue ControlAI63

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI81
    ContrastAI83
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI85
    FreshnessAI64
    Surprise ControlAI81

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%91
    Selection QualityAI89
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI93
    ConfidenceAI93
    RestraintAI84
    SignatureAI89

    Energy arc

    0:00126:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    5:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    A textbook techno transition. The incoming track's sub-bass is introduced so subtly it feels like a natural evolution of the first track.

    95
    10:12

    High-pass filter transition

    Effective use of filtering to clear space for the next track's lead elements.

    88
    11:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the groove while introducing new melodic textures.

    92
    18:20

    High-pass filter transition with percussive layering

    Smooth energy handoff using filtering to clear space for the new track's transients.

    88
    23:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    29:15

    Surgical EQ Swap

    100

    Technical subscores

    88

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    89

    Energy control

    96

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    91

    Harmonic compatibility

    90

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    21 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    145 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,544

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    144

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    1511

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    495

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (13:00, 19:00, 34:00, 44:00, 46:00, 50:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 5:45Seamless Evolution
    • 8:30Groove Lock
    • 14:50Atmospheric Peak
    • 21:30Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with brief, high-impact melodic breakdowns.
    • Incorporate more rhythmic syncopation to vary the groove.
    • Use vocal elements sparingly to add a human touch to the cinematic soundscape.
    • Continue to refine the balance between raw energy and melodic depth.
    • Experiment with more complex rhythmic layering during transitions.
    • Incorporate more frequent use of silence or extreme filtering to create dramatic tension releases.
    • Experiment with live stem manipulation during the final peak.
    • Incorporate more varied percussive elements in the outro fade.
    • Maintain the high level of harmonic awareness shown here.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Kevin de Vries's Kevin De Vries | Loveland Festival 2019 | LL111 get?
    Kevin De Vries | Loveland Festival 2019 | LL111 scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Kevin De Vries | Loveland Festival 2019 | LL111?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 06m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Kevin de Vries sets analysed

    Similar melodic techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Kevin de Vries analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.