SOONOS

    ReconditeRecondite@Fusion_Festival_Turmbuehne_June_27th_2026

    Melodic Techno · 1h 29m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    86/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 29m
    Genre
    Melodic Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Recondite.

    In short

    Recondite@Fusion_Festival_Turmbuehne_June_27th_2026 by Recondite scores 86/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (96/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (83/100).

    True mastery is found in the transitions you don't notice, but feel.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (24:00, 32:00, 41:00, 44:00, 52:00, 67:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Continue to explore the boundaries of minimalism; your restraint is your greatest asset.
    • Consider introducing a very subtle field recording or organic texture to add another layer of depth.
    • Maintain this level of technical precision; it is what allows the narrative to remain uninterrupted.
    • Experiment with brief moments of silence or extreme filtering to create artificial tension.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 5:12Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 5:12

      Invisible transition that maintains the hypnotic flow perfectly.

    • 9:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 9:45

      Beautifully aligned harmonic transition that adds emotional depth.

    • 12:15Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 12:15

      Intentional reset

    • 23:52Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 23:52

      A masterclass in transparency; the tracks merge into a single organic texture.

    • 30:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 30:15

      Smooth handover of the low-end while maintaining the melodic atmosphere.

    About this melodic techno set

    Recondite@Fusion_Festival_Turmbuehne_June_27th_2026 is a melodic techno DJ set by Recondite, running 1h 29m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    True mastery is found in the transitions you don't notice, but feel.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 36 points, moving between 20 and 86 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 247.9 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 26 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    True mastery is found in the transitions you don't notice, but feel.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured71
    Transition Qualitymeasured69
    Phrase Accuracymeasured95
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured91
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured77

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%91
    Narrative ArcAI95
    ProgressionAI90
    Tension & ReleaseAI87
    Section AwarenessAI92
    Flow ContinuityAI96
    PayoffAI83

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%86
    Energy Curvemeasured90
    PacingAI95
    MomentumAI92
    Peak ManagementAI88
    Energy HandoffAI89
    Fatigue ControlAI38

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI84
    ContrastAI87
    Transition Varietymeasured96
    Selection RiskAI89
    FreshnessAI32
    Surprise ControlAI84

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%96
    Selection QualityAI94
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI97
    ConfidenceAI95
    RestraintAI97
    SignatureAI97

    Energy arc

    0:0088:54

    Transitions analysed (6)

    5:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Invisible transition that maintains the hypnotic flow perfectly.

    95
    9:45

    Harmonic layering and filter sweep

    Beautifully aligned harmonic transition that adds emotional depth.

    92
    12:15

    Ghost Blend

    intentional_reset

    100
    18:40

    Texture Shift

    82
    23:52

    64-bar EQ cross-fade with subtle filtering

    A masterclass in transparency; the tracks merge into a single organic texture.

    95
    30:15

    Subtractive EQ blend

    Smooth handover of the low-end while maintaining the melodic atmosphere.

    92

    Technical subscores

    91

    EQ balance

    96

    Beat alignment

    89

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    93

    Musical coherence

    94

    Harmonic compatibility

    93

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    26 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    125 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,317

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    123

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    109

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    277

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (24:00, 32:00, 41:00, 44:00, 52:00, 67:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 4:30Percussive Shift
    • 8:50Melodic Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Continue to explore the boundaries of minimalism; your restraint is your greatest asset.
    • Consider introducing a very subtle field recording or organic texture to add another layer of depth.
    • Maintain this level of technical precision; it is what allows the narrative to remain uninterrupted.
    • Experiment with brief moments of silence or extreme filtering to create artificial tension.
    • Layer in more field recordings or organic textures to further distinguish the sonic identity.
    • Maintain this elite level of phrasing and EQ management.
    • Continue to explore the intersection of deep techno and ambient textures.
    • Use subtle mid-range variations to signal structural changes.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision in EQ management.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Recondite's Recondite@Fusion_Festival_Turmbuehne_June_27th_2026 get?
    Recondite@Fusion_Festival_Turmbuehne_June_27th_2026 scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Recondite@Fusion_Festival_Turmbuehne_June_27th_2026?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 29m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Recondite sets analysed

    Similar melodic techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Recondite analyses

    Drop your mix. See what happened.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / FLAC — min 1 min, max 200 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.