Joeski — Joeski Live @ Prysim Chicago 04.26.25

    House · 1h 44m · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    81/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 44m
    Genre
    House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Joeski.

    In short

    Joeski Live @ Prysim Chicago 04.26.25 by Joeski scores 81/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (90/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (79/100).

    The use of historical spoken word over a modern groove is a masterclass in creating a 'moment' that transcends the dancefloor.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:30, 35:00, 39:00, 46:00, 50:15, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with longer, more dramatic filter sweeps to create bigger release moments.
    • Introduce a melodic element (pad or chord) around the 10-minute mark to add emotional depth.
    • Use more frequent EQ teases of the incoming track's mid-range to build anticipation.
    • Experiment with longer, more dramatic filter sweeps to heighten tension during breakdowns.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 04:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 04:45

      Seamless transition where the tribal percussion of the incoming track perfectly replaces the outgoing groove.

    • 09:00Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 09:00

      Smooth transition focusing on the percussive elements, maintaining high energy throughout.

    • 29:15Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 29:15

      Perfectly executed transition that maintains the hypnotic groove without any audible shift in energy.

    About this house set

    Joeski Live @ Prysim Chicago 04.26.25 is a house DJ set by Joeski, running 1h 44m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 81/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The use of historical spoken word over a modern groove is a masterclass in creating a 'moment' that transcends the dancefloor.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 90/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 79/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 52 points, moving between 40 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 199.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 9 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The use of historical spoken word over a modern groove is a masterclass in creating a 'moment' that transcends the dancefloor.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%87
    Beat Alignmentmeasured94
    Transition Qualitymeasured77
    Phrase Accuracymeasured90
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured93
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%85
    Narrative ArcAI87
    ProgressionAI84
    Tension & ReleaseAI80
    Section AwarenessAI85
    Flow ContinuityAI90
    PayoffAI84

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%83
    Energy Curvemeasured77
    PacingAI87
    MomentumAI91
    Peak ManagementAI82
    Energy HandoffAI84
    Fatigue ControlAI69

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%79
    Unexpected MomentsAI78
    ContrastAI76
    Transition Varietymeasured89
    Selection RiskAI80
    FreshnessAI65
    Surprise ControlAI78

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%90
    Selection QualityAI87
    Identity ConsistencyAI95
    IntentionalityAI89
    ConfidenceAI91
    RestraintAI86
    SignatureAI87

    Energy arc

    00:00103:58

    Transitions analysed (6)

    04:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Seamless transition where the tribal percussion of the incoming track perfectly replaces the outgoing groove.

    92
    09:00

    Mid-range layering and filter fade

    Smooth transition focusing on the percussive elements, maintaining high energy throughout.

    85
    13:12

    Perfect Blend

    100
    17:25

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    21:10

    Seamless Handoff

    100
    29:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition that maintains the hypnotic groove without any audible shift in energy.

    94

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    85

    Energy control

    93

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    88

    Musical coherence

    86

    Harmonic compatibility

    89

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    9 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    82 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,220

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    93

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    37

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    262

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:30, 35:00, 39:00, 46:00, 50:15, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 02:30Vocal Hook Impact
    • 07:45Percussive Peak
    • 27:45Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with longer, more dramatic filter sweeps to create bigger release moments.
    • Introduce a melodic element (pad or chord) around the 10-minute mark to add emotional depth.
    • Use more frequent EQ teases of the incoming track's mid-range to build anticipation.
    • Experiment with longer, more dramatic filter sweeps to heighten tension during breakdowns.
    • Incorporate a track with a strong, recognizable melodic hook to provide an emotional anchor.
    • Use brief moments of silence or unexpected rhythmic stabs to keep the crowd on their toes.
    • Maintain the high level of phrase alignment demonstrated here.
    • Explore other historical or culturally significant spoken-word samples for future sets.
    • Use subtle high-pass filtering to create more dramatic entries for key vocal lines.
    • Ensure the mid-range frequencies are always clear when using important vocal samples.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Joeski's Joeski Live @ Prysim Chicago 04.26.25 get?
    Joeski Live @ Prysim Chicago 04.26.25 scores 81/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Joeski Live @ Prysim Chicago 04.26.25?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 44m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 79/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Joeski sets analysed

    Similar house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Joeski analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.