Joeski — Joeski Live At Output's Panther Room Brooklyn NY 12/23/2018

    House · 1h 60m · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    81/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 60m
    Genre
    House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Joeski.

    In short

    Joeski Live At Output's Panther Room Brooklyn NY 12/23/2018 by Joeski scores 81/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (89/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (79/100).

    Joeski proves that a great set is built on the foundation of a relentless, well-curated groove.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Groove continuity
    • Tension management
    • Thematic selection

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (20:00, 28:30, 38:00, 60:00, 66:00, 72:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Use more dramatic filter sweeps to signal transition points.
    • Incorporate brief atmospheric breakdowns to reset the crowd's ears.
    • Experiment with layering a third percussive loop for added complexity during peaks.
    • Experiment with more aggressive EQ cuts to create rhythmic 'holes' that the crowd can fill.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 5:42Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 5:42

      Invisible transition that maintains the hypnotic state perfectly.

    • 13:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 13:45

      Transparent transition where the new track's low end replaces the old one perfectly on the phrase.

    • 19:00Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 19:00

      Smooth introduction of a new synth line while slowly fading out the previous track's percussion.

    • 26:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 26:15

      Expertly brought in the vocal hook while maintaining the previous track's percussive drive.

    About this house set

    Joeski Live At Output's Panther Room Brooklyn NY 12/23/2018 is a house DJ set by Joeski, running 1h 60m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 81/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Joeski proves that a great set is built on the foundation of a relentless, well-curated groove.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 89/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 79/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 55 points, moving between 72 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    4 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 78.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 27 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    Joeski proves that a great set is built on the foundation of a relentless, well-curated groove.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured69
    Transition Qualitymeasured75
    Phrase Accuracymeasured90
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%86
    Narrative ArcAI88
    ProgressionAI85
    Tension & ReleaseAI82
    Section AwarenessAI86
    Flow ContinuityAI91
    PayoffAI84

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%83
    Energy Curvemeasured79
    PacingAI89
    MomentumAI92
    Peak ManagementAI81
    Energy HandoffAI85
    Fatigue ControlAI64

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%79
    Unexpected MomentsAI77
    ContrastAI79
    Transition Varietymeasured90
    Selection RiskAI79
    FreshnessAI63
    Surprise ControlAI77

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%89
    Selection QualityAI86
    Identity ConsistencyAI95
    IntentionalityAI89
    ConfidenceAI90
    RestraintAI87
    SignatureAI86

    Energy arc

    12:00119:48

    Transitions analysed (4)

    5:42

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Invisible transition that maintains the hypnotic state perfectly.

    94
    13:45

    Long EQ blend with bass swap

    Transparent transition where the new track's low end replaces the old one perfectly on the phrase.

    92
    19:00

    Mid-frequency focused blend

    Smooth introduction of a new synth line while slowly fading out the previous track's percussion.

    85
    26:15

    Long EQ blend with vocal layering

    Expertly brought in the vocal hook while maintaining the previous track's percussive drive.

    92

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    86

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    86

    Loudness control

    89

    Musical coherence

    85

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    27 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    38 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,170

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    101

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    129

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    352

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (20:00, 28:30, 38:00, 60:00, 66:00, 72:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Groove continuity
    • Tension management
    • Thematic selection

    Timeline

    • 7:15Vocal Hook Entry
    • 9:45Percussive Peak
    • 15:20Groove Lock Point
    • 21:45Vocal Peak
    • 27:30Vocal Hook Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Use more dramatic filter sweeps to signal transition points.
    • Incorporate brief atmospheric breakdowns to reset the crowd's ears.
    • Experiment with layering a third percussive loop for added complexity during peaks.
    • Experiment with more aggressive EQ cuts to create rhythmic 'holes' that the crowd can fill.
    • Use vocal loops more strategically to provide a narrative hook.
    • Incorporate subtle atmospheric pads to add emotional depth to the percussive drive.
    • Continue to master the art of the long blend, as it is a key strength.
    • Experiment with more diverse melodic textures to further enhance the emotional arc.
    • Maintain the high level of technical precision shown in this segment.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Joeski's Joeski Live At Output's Panther Room Brooklyn NY 12/23/2018 get?
    Joeski Live At Output's Panther Room Brooklyn NY 12/23/2018 scores 81/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Joeski Live At Output's Panther Room Brooklyn NY 12/23/2018?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 60m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 89/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 79/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Joeski sets analysed

    Similar house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Joeski analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.