DJ Stingray — DJ STINGRAY 313_KUBORAUM + TERRAFORMA at FUNKHAUS Harbour Berlin
Electro Techno · 2h 00m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, DJ Stingray.
In short
DJ STINGRAY 313_KUBORAUM + TERRAFORMA at FUNKHAUS Harbour Berlin by DJ Stingray scores 87/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (96/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (83/100).
Mastery here isn't in the complexity of the transitions, but in the relentless maintenance of a specific, high-pressure atmosphere.
Key takeaways
What worked
- Rhythmic precision
- Stylistic purity
- Energy sustainment
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (10:00, 14:00, 20:00, 24:00, 32:00, 60:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Textbook Detroit-style transition; high energy maintained with a sharp percussive switch.
A slight clash in the mid-frequencies during the overlap, but the rhythmic drive carries it through.
Masterful layering of two tracks that sound like one unified rhythmic machine.
Perfectly timed transition that maintains the driving energy.
Smooth integration of a new rhythmic element over the existing groove.
A decisive shift that maintains the high-velocity momentum perfectly.
Smooth integration of new percussive elements, building density.
About this electro techno set
DJ STINGRAY 313_KUBORAUM + TERRAFORMA at FUNKHAUS Harbour Berlin is a electro techno DJ set by DJ Stingray, running 2h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Mastery here isn't in the complexity of the transitions, but in the relentless maintenance of a specific, high-pressure atmosphere.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 83/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 41 points, moving between 82 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 616.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 25 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
Mastery here isn't in the complexity of the transitions, but in the relentless maintenance of a specific, high-pressure atmosphere.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%83
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%92
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%88
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%87
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%96
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
Fast EQ swap on the 1
Textbook Detroit-style transition; high energy maintained with a sharp percussive switch.
Aggressive mid-range blend
A slight clash in the mid-frequencies during the overlap, but the rhythmic drive carries it through.
Long percussive layering
Masterful layering of two tracks that sound like one unified rhythmic machine.
Fast EQ swap on the 1
Perfectly timed transition that maintains the driving energy.
Layered blend with high-pass filter
Smooth integration of a new rhythmic element over the existing groove.
Sharp EQ cut and rhythmic swap
A decisive shift that maintains the high-velocity momentum perfectly.
Layered blend with high-pass filtering
Smooth integration of new percussive elements, building density.
Technical subscores
86
EQ balance
90
Beat alignment
93
Energy control
90
Tempo stability
88
Loudness control
94
Musical coherence
77
Harmonic compatibility
85
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
25 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
182 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
7,208
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
63
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
21
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
859
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (10:00, 14:00, 20:00, 24:00, 32:00, 60:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What SOONOS heard
- Rhythmic precision
- Stylistic purity
- Energy sustainment
Timeline
- 0:00Immediate Immersion
- 6:30Rhythmic Complexity Peak
- 11:20Energy Surge
- 5:48Risky pressure or vibe dip
- 15:45Textural Peak
- 20:30Rhythmic Shift
- 28:30Rhythmic Peak
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does DJ Stingray's DJ STINGRAY 313_KUBORAUM + TERRAFORMA at FUNKHAUS Harbour Berlin get?
- DJ STINGRAY 313_KUBORAUM + TERRAFORMA at FUNKHAUS Harbour Berlin scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is DJ STINGRAY 313_KUBORAUM + TERRAFORMA at FUNKHAUS Harbour Berlin?
- The analysed recording runs 2h 00m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 83/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More DJ Stingray sets analysed
Similar electro techno sets
- Helena Hauff — Helena Hauff - Birds and Other Instruments #3 - www.thisisourhouse.org86
- Identified Patient — Identified Patient at Dekmantel Selectors 202483
- Identified Patient — Identified Patient & Gamma Intel at Dekmantel Selectors 202282
- Identified Patient — R-Imprint with Identified Patient & Jonas Landwehr - 08 Juillet 202282
- Identified Patient — Bezdaren - Opening Set for Identified Patient at Club Pave - 28/0278
- Identified Patient — Operator Radio 5th November 202177
- Identified Patient — MR TC & Identified Patient RLR 27-10-201773
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research