Dax JDax J @ Stone Techno Festival 2022

    Hard Techno · 2h 03m · analysed 22 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    87/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 03m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    About this hard techno set

    Dax J @ Stone Techno Festival 2022 is a hard techno DJ set by Dax J, running 2h 03m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 82/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 30 points, moving between 40 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 186.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 15 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%88
    Beat Alignmentmeasured88
    Transition Qualitymeasured85
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured78

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%92
    Narrative ArcAI93
    ProgressionAI94
    Tension & ReleaseAI88
    Section AwarenessAI91
    Flow ContinuityAI95
    PayoffAI95

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%86
    Energy Curvemeasured85
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI96
    Peak ManagementAI92
    Energy HandoffAI95
    Fatigue ControlAI36

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%82
    Unexpected MomentsAI85
    ContrastAI80
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI92
    FreshnessAI34
    Surprise ControlAI85

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%95
    Selection QualityAI95
    Identity ConsistencyAI99
    IntentionalityAI96
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI84
    SignatureAI96

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 89.

    Energy arc

    0:0066:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    2:15

    EQ blend into main kick

    Perfectly timed entry of the low-end, shifting the vibe from atmospheric to driving.

    92
    6:20

    Percussive loop layering

    Seamless addition of high-hat patterns that increase the perceived tempo.

    88
    12:45

    Long percussive blend with low-end swap

    Expertly executed transition where the rolling bassline of the incoming track takes over without a hint of energy loss.

    92
    17:30

    Fast layering of industrial textures

    A quick but controlled introduction of a new rhythmic element that heightens the tension.

    88
    24:12

    Long percussive blend with high-pass filtering

    Seamless integration of new rhythmic elements; the transition is almost imperceptible.

    92
    29:45

    EQ-based swap on the downbeat

    Effective low-end handover that maintains the driving energy of the set.

    88

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    95

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    88

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    81

    Harmonic compatibility

    87

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    15.3 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    63.8 ms

    Drift p95

    7,351

    Boundaries detected

    62

    Hard cuts / h

    12

    Clipping events

    201

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 19:00, 22:00, 30:00, 45:00, 51:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 2:15The Drop
    • 8:45Tension Peak
    • 14:50Hypnotic Peak
    • 21:15Tension Surge
    • 26:30Rhythmic Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with longer, more dramatic builds to further heighten the peak moments.
    • Incorporate more vocal stabs or recognizable samples to further engage the crowd.
    • Explore more melancholic or atmospheric elements to add further depth to the emotional journey.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Dax J's Dax J @ Stone Techno Festival 2022 get?
    Dax J @ Stone Techno Festival 2022 scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Dax J @ Stone Techno Festival 2022?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 03m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 82/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Dax J sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    All Dax J analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.