Crankdat — CRANKDAT @ EDC LAS VEGAS 2024

    Trap EDM · 1h 00m · EDC · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    84/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 00m
    Genre
    Trap EDM

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Crankdat.

    In short

    CRANKDAT @ EDC LAS VEGAS 2024 by Crankdat scores 84/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (90/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (80/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (2×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (38:30, 46:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 1:28Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 1:28

      Perfectly timed energy handoff that amplifies the momentum.

    • 4:12Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 4:12

      Smooth transition between two high-energy tracks with clear frequency separation.

    • 8:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 8:45

      Creative use of vocals to bridge two distinct energy peaks.

    • 13:15Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 13:15

      Strategic disruption

    • 19:05Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 19:05

      Intentional reset

    • 25:12Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 25:12

      Strategic disruption

    About this trap edm set

    CRANKDAT @ EDC LAS VEGAS 2024 is a trap edm DJ set by Crankdat, running 1h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 90/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 80/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 14 points, moving between 40 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    9 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 782.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 24 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured76
    Transition Qualitymeasured81
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured84
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%89
    Narrative ArcAI87
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI89
    Section AwarenessAI87
    Flow ContinuityAI84
    PayoffAI97

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%83
    Energy Curvemeasured82
    PacingAI84
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI92
    Energy HandoffAI93
    Fatigue ControlAI32

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%80
    Unexpected MomentsAI87
    ContrastAI76
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI86
    FreshnessAI29
    Surprise ControlAI87

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%90
    Selection QualityAI91
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI94
    ConfidenceAI96
    RestraintAI68
    SignatureAI92

    Energy arc

    0:0048:00

    Transitions analysed (9)

    1:28

    Fast cut-in on the drop

    Perfectly timed energy handoff that amplifies the momentum.

    92
    4:12

    EQ-balanced blend over 8 bars

    Smooth transition between two high-energy tracks with clear frequency separation.

    85
    8:45

    Vocal stem layering into drop swap

    Creative use of vocals to bridge two distinct energy peaks.

    88
    13:15

    Impact Cut

    strategic_disruption

    100
    16:20

    Layered Build

    82
    19:05

    Double Drop

    intentional_reset

    100
    22:00

    Quick Swap

    64
    25:12

    Perfect Drop Swap

    strategic_disruption

    100
    28:45

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82

    Technical subscores

    84

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    94

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    88

    Loudness control

    83

    Musical coherence

    83

    Harmonic compatibility

    87

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    24 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    196 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,612

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    52

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    48

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    303

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (2×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (38:30, 46:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 22:00Risky pressure or vibe dip
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Crankdat's CRANKDAT @ EDC LAS VEGAS 2024 get?
    CRANKDAT @ EDC LAS VEGAS 2024 scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is CRANKDAT @ EDC LAS VEGAS 2024?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 00m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 80/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Crankdat sets analysed

    Similar trap edm sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Crankdat analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…