Clara Cuvé — Jacy Moon Recorded Live @ Bloom - Clara Cuvé Warm Up
Hard Techno · 1h 32m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Clara Cuvé.
In short
Jacy Moon Recorded Live @ Bloom - Clara Cuvé Warm Up by Clara Cuvé scores 78/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (85/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (76/100).
Your patience is your greatest asset; you allow the music to do the work, which creates a truly professional hypnotic atmosphere.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (10:15, 17:12).
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 32:15, 35:00, 39:00, 45:00, 62:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Introduce more dynamic filter work to prevent energy plateaus.
- Experiment with short, high-tension loops during transitions to add a 'signature' flair.
- Consider adding a melodic element or vocal hook to create a memorable peak moment.
- Maintain the excellent phrase alignment as it is a core strength of your style.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Seamless introduction of the second track's hats, maintaining the hypnotic pulse.
Clean low-end handover; the energy remains stable throughout the transition.
Introduces a new melodic motif while phasing out the previous track's percussion.
Very smooth transition, maintaining the percussive drive while introducing a new bassline.
Effective use of EQs to layer the incoming track's percussion over the outgoing track's groove.
Clean energy handoff that signals a slight increase in intensity.
Extremely smooth transition, maintaining the hypnotic pulse without any phase issues.
Good management of overlapping synth elements; no audible clashing.
About this hard techno set
Jacy Moon Recorded Live @ Bloom - Clara Cuvé Warm Up is a hard techno DJ set by Clara Cuvé, running 1h 32m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 78/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Your patience is your greatest asset; you allow the music to do the work, which creates a truly professional hypnotic atmosphere.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 85/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 76/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 39 points, moving between 60 and 90 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
8 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 305.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
Your patience is your greatest asset; you allow the music to do the work, which creates a truly professional hypnotic atmosphere.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%81
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%83
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%80
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%76
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%85
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (8)
Long percussive blend with high-pass filtering
Seamless introduction of the second track's hats, maintaining the hypnotic pulse.
EQ swap on the 32nd bar
Clean low-end handover; the energy remains stable throughout the transition.
Atmospheric layering with mid-range focus
Introduces a new melodic motif while phasing out the previous track's percussion.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Very smooth transition, maintaining the percussive drive while introducing a new bassline.
Mid-frequency focused blend
Effective use of EQs to layer the incoming track's percussion over the outgoing track's groove.
Filter sweep and quick low-end swap
Clean energy handoff that signals a slight increase in intensity.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Extremely smooth transition, maintaining the hypnotic pulse without any phase issues.
Mid-range focused blend
Good management of overlapping synth elements; no audible clashing.
Technical subscores
84
EQ balance
89
Beat alignment
85
Energy control
91
Tempo stability
85
Loudness control
86
Musical coherence
83
Harmonic compatibility
85
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
20 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
171 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
5,521
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
164
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
8
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
317
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Recurring mid-frequency clash
Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (10:15, 17:12).
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 32:15, 35:00, 39:00, 45:00, 62:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 4:30Groove Lock Established
- 9:00Tension Peak
- 15:20Groove Lock
- 19:45Energy Plateau
- 25:45Groove Lock
- 29:30Energy Plateau
Coaching notes
- Introduce more dynamic filter work to prevent energy plateaus.
- Experiment with short, high-tension loops during transitions to add a 'signature' flair.
- Consider adding a melodic element or vocal hook to create a memorable peak moment.
- Maintain the excellent phrase alignment as it is a core strength of your style.
- Use more dramatic filter sweeps to signal transitions.
- Incorporate more varied mid-range textures to add depth.
- Practice smoother energy handovers to avoid dancefloor 'wobbles'.
- Experiment with brief atmospheric breakdowns to reset the crowd's ears.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Clara Cuvé's Jacy Moon Recorded Live @ Bloom - Clara Cuvé Warm Up get?
- Jacy Moon Recorded Live @ Bloom - Clara Cuvé Warm Up scores 78/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Jacy Moon Recorded Live @ Bloom - Clara Cuvé Warm Up?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 32m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 85/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 76/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Clara Cuvé sets analysed
- SPFDJ with Clara Cuvé - 08 October 201985
- CLARA CUVÉ I UNREAL STAGE I Nibirii Festival (FULL SET).m4a85
- Podcast 135 // Clara Cuvé84
- CLARA CUVÉ I UNREAL STAGE I Nibirii Festival84
- (Increased volume)Clara Cuvé | Boiler Room x Bónusz Festival84
- Talk Tech To Me Set - 14.9.25 - Clara Cuve81
- Clara Cuvé @ Rote Sonne, Munich (08.06.2019)80
Similar hard techno sets
- Kasia — Live @Ephimera Tulum October 202178
- Indira Paganotto — INDIRA PAGANOTTO: Tomorrowland @ Main Stage 2023 FULL SET77
- Paula Temple — Paula Temple Live at R&S 30 years party London 11 Oct 201379
- Klangkuenstler — SET SCHRANZ - Nikolina / Kuko / Vendex / In Verruf / Luciid / Klangkuenstler / Cloudy / Noise Not War77
- Kasia — Kasia DVD - Sophie | melodic techno & progressive house DJ set77
- Rebekah — DJ set at Nature One 201580
- VTSS — VTSS 🗿 mix at Alien Jams / NTS Radio80
- Rebekah — Rebekah @ PRSPCT Rotterdam 2/12/2380
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research