Zeds Dead — Zeds Dead Live at EDC Las Vegas 2022

    EDM · 59 min · EDC · analysed 22 Jul 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    83/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    59 min
    Genre
    EDM

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Zeds Dead.

    In short

    Zeds Dead Live at EDC Las Vegas 2022 by Zeds Dead scores 83/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is STORYTELLING (87/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (79/100).

    This segment demonstrates how a DJ can use familiar pop culture touchstones to elevate a high-intensity electronic set into a memorable collective experience.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (3×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (42:00, 48:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    About this edm set

    Zeds Dead Live at EDC Las Vegas 2022 is a edm DJ set by Zeds Dead, running 59 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 83/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This segment demonstrates how a DJ can use familiar pop culture touchstones to elevate a high-intensity electronic set into a memorable collective experience.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is STORYTELLING at 87/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 79/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 27 points, moving between 20 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    9 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 782.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 23 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This segment demonstrates how a DJ can use familiar pop culture touchstones to elevate a high-intensity electronic set into a memorable collective experience.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision85
    Track selection91
    Energy arc94
    Crowd control94
    Harmonic depth78
    Groove patience65
    Creativity82
    Signature93

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%79
    Beat Alignmentmeasured78
    Transition Qualitymeasured59
    Phrase Accuracymeasured90
    EQ & Frequency Controlmeasured82
    Tempo Stabilitymeasured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured67

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%87
    Narrative ArcAI88
    ProgressionAI82
    Tension & ReleaseAI92
    Section AwarenessAI85
    Flow ContinuityAI81
    PayoffAI95

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured88
    PacingAI80
    MomentumAI92
    Peak ManagementAI90
    Energy HandoffAI82
    Fatigue ControlAI60

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%80
    Unexpected MomentsAI78
    ContrastAI85
    Transition Varietymeasured88
    Selection RiskAI75
    FreshnessAI70
    Surprise ControlAI78

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%85
    Selection QualityAI85
    Identity ConsistencyAI90
    IntentionalityAI88
    ConfidenceAI92
    RestraintAI65
    SignatureAI90

    Energy arc

    0:0059:00

    Transitions analysed (9)

    3:58

    Perfect Drop Swap

    intentional_reset

    100
    5:42

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    8:15

    Clean Vocal Layering

    strategic_disruption

    100
    12:45

    Perfect Energy Handoff

    100
    15:40

    Minor EQ Overlap

    intentional_reset

    82
    18:25

    Elite Double Drop

    100
    22:00

    Slight Level Jump

    strategic_disruption

    82
    26:08

    Perfect Drop Swap

    strategic_disruption

    100
    28:45

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82

    Technical subscores

    82

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    88

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    80

    Loudness control

    85

    Musical coherence

    88

    Harmonic compatibility

    84

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    23 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    200 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,524

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    154

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    0

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    533

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (3×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (42:00, 48:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 1:15The First Drop
    • 5:42EQ Masking
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Zeds Dead's Zeds Dead Live at EDC Las Vegas 2022 get?
    Zeds Dead Live at EDC Las Vegas 2022 scores 83/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Zeds Dead Live at EDC Las Vegas 2022?
    The analysed recording runs 59 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    STORYTELLING is the strongest category at 87/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 79/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Zeds Dead sets analysed

    Similar edm sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Zeds Dead analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.