WhoMadeWho — WhoMadeWho WorldWide [Episode 005]
Melodic Techno · 1h 03m · analysed 21 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, WhoMadeWho.
In short
WhoMadeWho WorldWide [Episode 005] by WhoMadeWho scores 81/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (92/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (81/100).
The DJ uses silence and space as effectively as sound, creating a mix that breathes and evolves naturally.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (4:00, 31:00, 36:15, 42:00, 50:00, 54:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Maintain the high level of EQ precision during long blends.
- Consider adding a 'signature' live element or unique FX to further distinguish the identity.
- Ensure the transition into the 'peak' phase (likely in segment 3/6) is clearly signaled.
- Experiment with brief moments of silence to reset the listener's ear.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Perfectly executed transition that maintains the atmospheric integrity of the set.
Clean energy transfer, shifting the groove into a more driving percussive phase.
Intentional reset
Strategic disruption
About this melodic techno set
WhoMadeWho WorldWide [Episode 005] is a melodic techno DJ set by WhoMadeWho, running 1h 03m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 81/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
The DJ uses silence and space as effectively as sound, creating a mix that breathes and evolves naturally.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 92/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 81/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 25 points, moving between 20 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
8 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 615.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The DJ uses silence and space as effectively as sound, creating a mix that breathes and evolves naturally.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%88
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%88
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%84
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%81
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%92
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (8)
Long EQ blend with high-pass filter handover
Perfectly executed transition that maintains the atmospheric integrity of the set.
Bass-swap on the 32nd bar
Clean energy transfer, shifting the groove into a more driving percussive phase.
Invisible Blend
Talkover Handoff
intentional_reset
Harmonic Layering
Perfect Blend
Surgical EQ Swap
Minor Level Drift
strategic_disruption
Technical subscores
89
EQ balance
95
Beat alignment
85
Energy control
95
Tempo stability
86
Loudness control
92
Musical coherence
93
Harmonic compatibility
90
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
20 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
159 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,749
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
22
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
62
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
318
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (4:00, 31:00, 36:15, 42:00, 50:00, 54:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 0:45Thematic Hook
- 5:30Groove Lock
Coaching notes
- Maintain the high level of EQ precision during long blends.
- Consider adding a 'signature' live element or unique FX to further distinguish the identity.
- Ensure the transition into the 'peak' phase (likely in segment 3/6) is clearly signaled.
- Experiment with brief moments of silence to reset the listener's ear.
- Incorporate more live-sounding percussion to enhance the organic feel.
- Use subtle delay throws on vocals to bridge transitions more creatively.
- Experiment with layering commentary over subtle musical loops to maintain hypnotic flow.
- Introduce more rhythmic complexity in the mid-section to enhance physical engagement.
- Explore slightly more aggressive EQ swaps to create dynamic energy shifts.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does WhoMadeWho's WhoMadeWho WorldWide [Episode 005] get?
- WhoMadeWho WorldWide [Episode 005] scores 81/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is WhoMadeWho WorldWide [Episode 005]?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 03m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 92/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 81/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More WhoMadeWho sets analysed
Similar melodic techno sets
- Patrice Bäumel — HALO at Shelter Amsterdam | December 8th, 202381
- Argy — ARGY X @ Second Speed x Lost Minds 12.07.2681
- Innellea — Innellea Live at EDC Las Vegas 202681
- Adriatique — Adriatique X Tulum 2026 Replicated Set82
- Pole Folder — Pole Folder-Brussels 11.10.2014-Part 282
- Recondite — "INDIFFERENT MIX" BY RECONDITE82
- Chris Avantgarde — Mix MEDOLIC TECHNO-AUTOR: DJ Faco-Anyma-tale of us-argy-massano-chris avantgarde-mrak.82
- Pole Folder — Pole Folder - Woodstock69 06.04.2014 - Part282
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research