WhoMadeWhoWhoMadeWho (Hybrid DJ Set) at Circoloco Mexico City 2023

    Melodic Techno · 1h 12m · Circoloco · analysed 21 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    60/100
    Level
    developing
    Duration
    1h 12m
    Genre
    Melodic Techno

    About this melodic techno set

    WhoMadeWho (Hybrid DJ Set) at Circoloco Mexico City 2023 is a melodic techno DJ set by WhoMadeWho, running 1h 12m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 60/100 overall — developing.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ uses percussion not just for rhythm, but as a storytelling device that bridges disparate musical worlds.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 84/100.

    The final score is capped by measured bm: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 33 points, moving between 20 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 295.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 30 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    The DJ uses percussion not just for rhythm, but as a storytelling device that bridges disparate musical worlds.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%84
    Beat Alignmentmeasured60
    Transition Qualitymeasured89
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI87
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI89

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%88
    Energy Curvemeasured91
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI91
    Peak ManagementAI86
    Energy HandoffAI86
    Fatigue ControlAI74

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%84
    Unexpected MomentsAI82
    ContrastAI82
    Transition Varietymeasured91
    Selection RiskAI88
    FreshnessAI73
    Surprise ControlAI82

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI93
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI92
    RestraintAI89
    SignatureAI96

    Final score capped by measured execution (bm) — weighted average was 88.

    Energy arc

    0:0072:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    3:05

    Long textural blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed handover; the organic groove never wavers.

    90
    7:22

    Melodic layering and EQ fade

    A slightly busier transition but well-managed mid-range frequencies.

    82
    11:25

    Phrase-aligned drop-in

    Confident entry of a new rhythmic element that elevates the energy.

    88
    15:32

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap on phrase

    A textbook example of a transparent transition. The incoming track's percussion is introduced so subtly it feels like a natural progression of the current track.

    92
    20:15

    Filtered transition with melodic overlap

    Smooth transition that uses a high-pass filter on the outgoing track to make room for the incoming melodic elements. Very effective for shifting the mood.

    88
    26:00

    Perfect Blend

    100
    30:15

    Minor EQ Overlap

    intentional_artistic

    82

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    86

    Energy control

    96

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    92

    Musical coherence

    92

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    30.3 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    120.6 ms

    Drift p95

    4,303

    Boundaries detected

    43

    Hard cuts / h

    22

    Clipping events

    200

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (12:00, 22:00, 32:00, 48:00, 52:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    • Beat alignment needs work — typical drift of 30 ms

      Measured median beat-grid drift is 30 ms across the transitions. Reference: pro ≤ 25 ms, needs work 30-42 ms, must be reworked > 42 ms. Above ~30 ms the kick flams and dancers feel the blend slipping.

    Timeline

    • 1:15Vocal Hook Entry
    • 5:45Groove Lock
    • 10:30Energy Plateau
    • 14:20Vocal Hook Integration
    • 18:45Percussive Peak
    • 22:10Melodic Shift

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with more dramatic EQ cuts during transitions to create sharper energy shifts.
    • Introduce a recurring melodic motif to strengthen the overall narrative identity.
    • Vary the kick drum texture more frequently to maintain rhythmic interest over long periods.
    • Continue leveraging vocal stems as transitional anchors.
    • Introduce more dramatic 'silence' gaps to emphasize major drops.
    • Fine-tune mid-range EQ during the most dense melodic passages.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does WhoMadeWho's WhoMadeWho (Hybrid DJ Set) at Circoloco Mexico City 2023 get?
    WhoMadeWho (Hybrid DJ Set) at Circoloco Mexico City 2023 scores 60/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is WhoMadeWho (Hybrid DJ Set) at Circoloco Mexico City 2023?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 12m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 84/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More WhoMadeWho sets analysed

    Similar melodic techno sets

    All WhoMadeWho analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.