Steve AngelloSteve Angello - Tomorrowland 2013

    Commercial EDM · 1h 29m · Tomorrowland · analysed 20 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    88/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 29m
    Genre
    Commercial EDM

    About this commercial edm set

    Steve Angello - Tomorrowland 2013 is a commercial edm DJ set by Steve Angello, running 1h 29m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 88/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Angello proves that simplicity in rhythm combined with iconic melodic hooks is the ultimate formula for stadium-scale success.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is STORYTELLING at 93/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 84/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 26 points, moving between 70 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1140.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 22 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    Angello proves that simplicity in rhythm combined with iconic melodic hooks is the ultimate formula for stadium-scale success.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%87
    Beat Alignmentmeasured79
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured95
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%93
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI94
    Section AwarenessAI93
    Flow ContinuityAI90
    PayoffAI97

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%89
    Energy Curvemeasured92
    PacingAI91
    MomentumAI96
    Peak ManagementAI94
    Energy HandoffAI91
    Fatigue ControlAI56

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%84
    Unexpected MomentsAI82
    ContrastAI86
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI91
    FreshnessAI58
    Surprise ControlAI82

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%93
    Selection QualityAI91
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI82
    SignatureAI93

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 89.

    Energy arc

    44:0088:00

    Transitions analysed (8)

    6:12

    Perfect Energy Handoff

    intentional_reset

    100
    9:45

    Minor Level Jump

    82
    12:30

    Perfect Blend

    100
    16:20

    Strategic Drop

    intentional_reset

    100
    20:10

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    22:15

    Perfect Blend

    100
    25:10

    Minor EQ Overlap

    intentional_reset

    82
    29:45

    Seamless Handoff

    100

    Technical subscores

    85

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    91

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    89

    Musical coherence

    89

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    22.1 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    222.8 ms

    Drift p95

    5,309

    Boundaries detected

    20

    Hard cuts / h

    230

    Clipping events

    106

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (44:00, 48:00, 55:00, 63:30, 67:00, 72:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Coaching notes

    • Use more subtle EQ filtering during long blends to create a more organic evolution of sound.
    • Experiment with varying the length of buildups to keep the crowd guessing.
    • Incorporate more 'live' elements or unique edits to further distinguish the set from a standard playlist.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Steve Angello's Steve Angello - Tomorrowland 2013 get?
    Steve Angello - Tomorrowland 2013 scores 88/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Steve Angello - Tomorrowland 2013?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 29m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    STORYTELLING is the strongest category at 93/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 84/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Steve Angello sets analysed

    Similar commercial edm sets

    All Steve Angello analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.