Speedy J — SPEEDY J ▪ recorded at 909 Festival 2022

    Experimental Techno · 2h 03m · analysed 19 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    88/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 03m
    Genre
    Experimental Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Speedy J.

    In short

    SPEEDY J ▪ recorded at 909 Festival 2022 by Speedy J scores 88/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (96/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (85/100).

    This is how you maintain energy for 10,000 people without ever playing a 'banger'.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (5:00, 19:00, 29:15, 67:00, 76:00, 89:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps to create moments of release.
    • Consider adding a subtle vocal element to increase crowd connection.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision; it is world-class.
    • Experiment with more dramatic frequency cuts to create brief moments of tension release.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:12Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 3:12

      A textbook example of hypnotic techno mixing; the tracks merge into a single entity.

    • 7:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 7:45

      Smooth transition that focuses on shifting the rhythmic focus rather than a hard cut.

    • 12:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 12:45

      Perfectly executed transition where the new track's low-end replaces the old one without any phase cancellation.

    • 17:30Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 17:30

      Smooth introduction of modular synth elements while filtering out the outgoing track's highs.

    • 23:45Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 23:45

      Seamless introduction of industrial textures; the transition is almost imperceptible.

    • 27:12Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 27:12

      Effective energy handoff; the new track maintains the momentum perfectly.

    About this experimental techno set

    SPEEDY J ▪ recorded at 909 Festival 2022 is a experimental techno DJ set by Speedy J, running 2h 03m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 88/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This is how you maintain energy for 10,000 people without ever playing a 'banger'.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 85/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 42 points, moving between 40 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 173.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 2 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This is how you maintain energy for 10,000 people without ever playing a 'banger'.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%87
    Beat Alignmentmeasured98
    Transition Qualitymeasured65
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured90
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured74

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%93
    Narrative ArcAI95
    ProgressionAI93
    Tension & ReleaseAI90
    Section AwarenessAI93
    Flow ContinuityAI96
    PayoffAI90

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%87
    Energy Curvemeasured85
    PacingAI94
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI90
    Energy HandoffAI92
    Fatigue ControlAI52

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%85
    Unexpected MomentsAI86
    ContrastAI85
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI91
    FreshnessAI50
    Surprise ControlAI86

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%96
    Selection QualityAI94
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI97
    ConfidenceAI96
    RestraintAI92
    SignatureAI96

    Energy arc

    0:00118:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    3:12

    Long EQ blend with sub-bass priority

    A textbook example of hypnotic techno mixing; the tracks merge into a single entity.

    95
    7:45

    Textural layering and high-pass filtering

    Smooth transition that focuses on shifting the rhythmic focus rather than a hard cut.

    92
    12:45

    Long EQ blend with sub-bass swap

    Perfectly executed transition where the new track's low-end replaces the old one without any phase cancellation.

    95
    17:30

    Mid-range layering and high-pass filter sweep

    Smooth introduction of modular synth elements while filtering out the outgoing track's highs.

    92
    23:45

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filtering

    Seamless introduction of industrial textures; the transition is almost imperceptible.

    90
    27:12

    Mid-range swap on phrase

    Effective energy handoff; the new track maintains the momentum perfectly.

    88

    Technical subscores

    90

    EQ balance

    95

    Beat alignment

    92

    Energy control

    96

    Tempo stability

    91

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    91

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    2 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    59 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,352

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    152

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    109

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    272

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (5:00, 19:00, 29:15, 67:00, 76:00, 89:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:45Groove Establishment
    • 6:20Tension Peak
    • 14:15Groove Lock Peak
    • 19:50Tension Build
    • 25:30Textural Peak
    • 29:15Tension Hold

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps to create moments of release.
    • Consider adding a subtle vocal element to increase crowd connection.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision; it is world-class.
    • Experiment with more dramatic frequency cuts to create brief moments of tension release.
    • Introduce a subtle melodic motif to provide a narrative anchor amidst the industrial textures.
    • Vary the rhythmic complexity of the hi-hat layers to enhance the sense of forward motion.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Speedy J's SPEEDY J ▪ recorded at 909 Festival 2022 get?
    SPEEDY J ▪ recorded at 909 Festival 2022 scores 88/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is SPEEDY J ▪ recorded at 909 Festival 2022?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 03m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 85/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Speedy J sets analysed

    Similar experimental techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Speedy J analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.