Sam Feldt — Sam Feldt presents: Future Tropical (Volume 2)

    Tropical House · 1h 26m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    64/100
    Level
    developing
    Duration
    1h 26m
    Genre
    Tropical House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Sam Feldt.

    In short

    Sam Feldt presents: Future Tropical (Volume 2) by Sam Feldt scores 64/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (90/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (78/100).

    Sam Feldt demonstrates that a mix's power often lies in its ability to sustain a specific mood rather than relying on aggressive peaks.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Thematic consistency
    • Technical precision
    • Emotional payoff

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (10:30, 32:00, 37:00, 52:00, 60:00, 64:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
    • Beat alignment needs work — typical drift of 30 ms — Measured median beat-grid drift is 30 ms across the transitions. Reference: pro ≤ 25 ms, needs work 30-42 ms, must be reworked > 42 ms. Above ~30 ms the kick flams and dancers feel the blend slipping.

    What to try next

    • Introduce a high-tension breakdown around the 15-minute mark to break the rhythmic plateau.
    • Experiment with subtle percussive layering during the long vocal blends to add texture.
    • Use high-pass filters more aggressively during builds to increase the physical impact of the drops.
    • Introduce a 'wildcard' track that breaks the tropical house mold to add a layer of surprise.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 1:15Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 1:15

      Smooth transition from the orchestral intro into the first beat-driven track.

    • 5:42Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 5:42

      Flawless blend between two vocal tracks, maintaining melodic harmony.

    • 14:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 14:12

      Perfectly executed transition. The incoming bassline takes over exactly on the phrase, maintaining the groove without any volume dip.

    • 18:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 18:45

      Smooth transition using high-pass filtering to clear space for the incoming track's percussion.

    • 24:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 24:15

      A masterclass in melodic house mixing; the tracks overlap for 32 bars without any frequency clashing.

    • 28:30Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 28:30

      Clean energy handoff. The DJ uses a high-pass filter to thin out the outgoing track before dropping the new bassline.

    About this tropical house set

    Sam Feldt presents: Future Tropical (Volume 2) is a tropical house DJ set by Sam Feldt, running 1h 26m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 64/100 overall — developing.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Sam Feldt demonstrates that a mix's power often lies in its ability to sustain a specific mood rather than relying on aggressive peaks.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 90/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 78/100.

    The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 47 points, moving between 40 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 798.9 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 30 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    Sam Feldt demonstrates that a mix's power often lies in its ability to sustain a specific mood rather than relying on aggressive peaks.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured62
    Transition Qualitymeasured81
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%87
    Narrative ArcAI90
    ProgressionAI85
    Tension & ReleaseAI81
    Section AwarenessAI88
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI84

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured87
    PacingAI85
    MomentumAI89
    Peak ManagementAI82
    Energy HandoffAI84
    Fatigue ControlAI67

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%78
    Unexpected MomentsAI74
    ContrastAI79
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI75
    FreshnessAI64
    Surprise ControlAI74

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%90
    Selection QualityAI87
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI90
    ConfidenceAI91
    RestraintAI82
    SignatureAI90

    Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 84.

    Energy arc

    0:0085:55

    Transitions analysed (6)

    1:15

    Cinematic fade into rhythmic intro

    Smooth transition from the orchestral intro into the first beat-driven track.

    90
    5:42

    Vocal-led EQ blend

    Flawless blend between two vocal tracks, maintaining melodic harmony.

    94
    14:12

    Long melodic blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition. The incoming bassline takes over exactly on the phrase, maintaining the groove without any volume dip.

    92
    18:45

    Filter sweep and rhythmic overlap

    Smooth transition using high-pass filtering to clear space for the incoming track's percussion.

    85
    24:15

    Long EQ blend with harmonic matching

    A masterclass in melodic house mixing; the tracks overlap for 32 bars without any frequency clashing.

    92
    28:30

    Filter sweep into drop swap

    Clean energy handoff. The DJ uses a high-pass filter to thin out the outgoing track before dropping the new bassline.

    85

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    95

    Beat alignment

    86

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    90

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    93

    Harmonic compatibility

    91

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    30 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    227 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,138

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    29

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    0

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    166

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (10:30, 32:00, 37:00, 52:00, 60:00, 64:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    • Beat alignment needs work — typical drift of 30 ms

      Measured median beat-grid drift is 30 ms across the transitions. Reference: pro ≤ 25 ms, needs work 30-42 ms, must be reworked > 42 ms. Above ~30 ms the kick flams and dancers feel the blend slipping.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Thematic consistency
    • Technical precision
    • Emotional payoff

    Timeline

    • 0:00Cinematic Opening
    • 3:45Vocal Hook Entry
    • 8:15Energy Plateau
    • 12:45Vocal Hook Peak
    • 16:20Energy Plateau
    • 24:15Harmonic Handoff
    • 27:20Piano Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Introduce a high-tension breakdown around the 15-minute mark to break the rhythmic plateau.
    • Experiment with subtle percussive layering during the long vocal blends to add texture.
    • Use high-pass filters more aggressively during builds to increase the physical impact of the drops.
    • Introduce a 'wildcard' track that breaks the tropical house mold to add a layer of surprise.
    • Use more dramatic filter sweeps during breakdowns to heighten the sense of anticipation.
    • Experiment with layering a third percussive element during long blends to add rhythmic complexity.
    • Use more dramatic filter sweeps to signal upcoming transitions.
    • Incorporate live-sounding percussive elements to enhance the 'organic' tropical feel.
    • Experiment with slightly more aggressive bass swaps to add physical impact.
    • Experiment with longer instrumental transitions to build more tension.
    • Incorporate a 'surprise' genre-blend to break the melodic predictability.
    • Use manual filter sweeps more dynamically to add a human touch to the digital precision.
    • Introduce more organic instrumental layers to further distinguish the tropical identity.
    • Experiment with slightly more aggressive FX during builds to heighten festival-style tension.
    • Consider a brief 'darker' melodic detour to make the euphoric peaks feel even brighter by contrast.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Sam Feldt's Sam Feldt presents: Future Tropical (Volume 2) get?
    Sam Feldt presents: Future Tropical (Volume 2) scores 64/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Sam Feldt presents: Future Tropical (Volume 2)?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 26m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 78/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Sam Feldt sets analysed

    Similar tropical house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Sam Feldt analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.