Mersiv — Shambhala 2019 Mix Series - Mersiv
MID Tempo Bass · 1h 08m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Mersiv.
In short
Shambhala 2019 Mix Series - Mersiv by Mersiv scores 84/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (81/100).
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (2×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (56:00, 60:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Incorporate more melodic variety to broaden the emotional arc.
- Experiment with longer build-ups to increase tension before major drops.
- Use more extreme filter sweeps to create greater dynamic contrast.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Seamless transition into the first major drop, maintaining energy.
Effective transition that shifts the rhythmic focus without losing momentum.
Smooth transition between two halftime tracks, maintaining the low-end groove.
A bold cut that slightly jars the energy but recovers quickly into a heavy groove.
Perfectly executed transition that builds immense tension through layering.
Perfectly executed bass handover, maintaining sub-pressure.
Sharp transition that uses a snare hit to mask the switch.
About this mid tempo bass set
Shambhala 2019 Mix Series - Mersiv is a mid tempo bass DJ set by Mersiv, running 1h 08m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 81/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 12 points, moving between 30 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 426.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%81
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%90
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%84
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%84
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%91
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
EQ swap on the drop
Seamless transition into the first major drop, maintaining energy.
Short blend with filter sweep
Effective transition that shifts the rhythmic focus without losing momentum.
EQ-heavy blend with high-pass filtering
Smooth transition between two halftime tracks, maintaining the low-end groove.
Quick cut on the drop
A bold cut that slightly jars the energy but recovers quickly into a heavy groove.
Long melodic blend with vocal layering
Perfectly executed transition that builds immense tension through layering.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly executed bass handover, maintaining sub-pressure.
Impact cut on the downbeat
Sharp transition that uses a snare hit to mask the switch.
Technical subscores
84
EQ balance
93
Beat alignment
90
Energy control
95
Tempo stability
86
Loudness control
88
Musical coherence
86
Harmonic compatibility
87
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
21 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
158 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
4,043
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
148
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
29
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
584
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (2×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (56:00, 60:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 1:42First Drop Impact
- 7:15Peak Energy Moment
- 14:50Atmospheric Peak
- 18:30Mid-Range Clutter
- 16:20Risky pressure or vibe dip
- 27:15Atmospheric Peak
Coaching notes
- Incorporate more melodic variety to broaden the emotional arc.
- Experiment with longer build-ups to increase tension before major drops.
- Use more extreme filter sweeps to create greater dynamic contrast.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Mersiv's Shambhala 2019 Mix Series - Mersiv get?
- Shambhala 2019 Mix Series - Mersiv scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Shambhala 2019 Mix Series - Mersiv?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 08m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 81/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Mersiv sets analysed
Similar mid tempo bass sets
- Bassnectar — Bassnectar - Mesmerizing The Ultra [2005]84
- 1788-L — ROAD TO LOST LANDS 2024 : 1788-L VELVET UNDERGROUND TORONTO SET85
- Bassnectar — DREAMTEMPO [1999]86
- Bassnectar — Bassnectar - Mixtape 1387
- Bassnectar — Bassnectar - Immersive Music Mixtape - Side Two87
- 1788-L — Mid-Tempo (REZZ/Deathpact/1788-L)80
- 1788-L — DEADBEATS MIX V2(REZZ / 1788-L / Blanke / k?d / Shadient / Lucille Croft / ATLAST / And More...)79
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research