Bassnectar — DREAMTEMPO [1999]

    MID Tempo Bass · 1h 25m · analysed 20 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    86/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 25m
    Genre
    MID Tempo Bass

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Bassnectar.

    In short

    DREAMTEMPO [1999] by Bassnectar scores 86/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (81/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (26:00, 30:00, 34:00, 36:00, 40:00, 73:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
    • Beat alignment needs work — typical drift of 34 ms — Measured median beat-grid drift is 34 ms across the transitions. Reference: pro ≤ 25 ms, needs work 30-42 ms, must be reworked > 42 ms. Above ~30 ms the kick flams and dancers feel the blend slipping.

    What to try next

    • Continue to explore long-form atmospheric blends.
    • Experiment with field recordings to add further depth to ambient sections.
    • Maintain the high level of EQ precision shown here.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 2:25Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 2:25

      Seamless transition where the pads of Track A dissolve into the textures of Track B.

    • 6:22Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 6:22

      A masterclass in patience; the two tracks coexist for over a minute, creating a new hybrid groove.

    • 10:15Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 10:15

      Slightly noticeable frequency buildup in the high-mids during the swap.

    • 14:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 14:12

      Beautifully executed transition where the shimmering highs of the incoming track replace the outgoing hats almost imperceptibly.

    • 18:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 18:45

      The DJ carves out space in the mids for the new lead melody while slowly fading the previous track's percussion.

    • 22:30Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 22:30

      A smoother, more traditional fade that relies on the atmospheric tails of the tracks to bridge the gap.

    • 25:30Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 25:30

      Perfectly executed 64-bar blend. The transition is almost imperceptible.

    About this mid tempo bass set

    DREAMTEMPO [1999] is a mid tempo bass DJ set by Bassnectar, running 1h 25m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 81/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 25 points, moving between 10 and 82 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1071.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 34 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%81
    Beat Alignmentmeasured55
    Transition Qualitymeasured86
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured87
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured88
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%88
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI95
    PayoffAI75

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured90
    PacingAI94
    MomentumAI85
    Peak ManagementAI84
    Energy HandoffAI87
    Fatigue ControlAI51

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI83
    ContrastAI85
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI84
    FreshnessAI53
    Surprise ControlAI83

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI93
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI94
    ConfidenceAI90
    RestraintAI96
    SignatureAI93

    Energy arc

    0:0084:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    2:25

    Ambient crossfade with high-shelf attenuation

    Seamless transition where the pads of Track A dissolve into the textures of Track B.

    90
    6:22

    Long-form rhythmic layering

    A masterclass in patience; the two tracks coexist for over a minute, creating a new hybrid groove.

    94
    10:15

    EQ-heavy swap on the downbeat

    Slightly noticeable frequency buildup in the high-mids during the swap.

    78
    14:12

    Long EQ blend with high-frequency handover

    Beautifully executed transition where the shimmering highs of the incoming track replace the outgoing hats almost imperceptibly.

    92
    18:45

    Subtractive EQ layering

    The DJ carves out space in the mids for the new lead melody while slowly fading the previous track's percussion.

    88
    22:30

    Cross-fader fade with reverb tail

    A smoother, more traditional fade that relies on the atmospheric tails of the tracks to bridge the gap.

    85
    25:30

    Long-form EQ blend

    Perfectly executed 64-bar blend. The transition is almost imperceptible.

    92

    Technical subscores

    87

    EQ balance

    89

    Beat alignment

    82

    Energy control

    88

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    93

    Harmonic compatibility

    89

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    34 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    169 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,073

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    29

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    56

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    609

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (26:00, 30:00, 34:00, 36:00, 40:00, 73:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    • Beat alignment needs work — typical drift of 34 ms

      Measured median beat-grid drift is 34 ms across the transitions. Reference: pro ≤ 25 ms, needs work 30-42 ms, must be reworked > 42 ms. Above ~30 ms the kick flams and dancers feel the blend slipping.

    Timeline

    • 0:45Atmospheric Hook
    • 7:30Groove Saturation
    • 10:15Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 16:15Textural Peak
    • 20:40Subtle Energy Sag
    • 28:45Percussive Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Continue to explore long-form atmospheric blends.
    • Experiment with field recordings to add further depth to ambient sections.
    • Maintain the high level of EQ precision shown here.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Bassnectar's DREAMTEMPO [1999] get?
    DREAMTEMPO [1999] scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is DREAMTEMPO [1999]?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 25m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 81/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Bassnectar sets analysed

    Similar mid tempo bass sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Bassnectar analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.