Mersiv — Mersiv Live Set - Out Of Bounds Tour Fort Lauderdale 2023
MID Tempo Bass · 1h 16m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Mersiv.
In short
Mersiv Live Set - Out Of Bounds Tour Fort Lauderdale 2023 by Mersiv scores 60/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (77/100).
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (3×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:30, 32:00, 60:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
- Beat alignment needs work — typical drift of 30 ms — Measured median beat-grid drift is 30 ms across the transitions. Reference: pro ≤ 25 ms, needs work 30-42 ms, must be reworked > 42 ms. Above ~30 ms the kick flams and dancers feel the blend slipping.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Perfectly timed transition from hip-hop groove into heavy dubstep, maintaining vocal energy.
Smooth transition using a high-pass filter to build tension before dropping into a new bass rhythm.
Strategic disruption
Intentional reset
Perfectly timed energy handoff between two high-intensity tracks.
Slightly crowded mid-range during the transition, but energy is maintained.
About this mid tempo bass set
Mersiv Live Set - Out Of Bounds Tour Fort Lauderdale 2023 is a mid tempo bass DJ set by Mersiv, running 1h 16m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 60/100 overall — developing.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 77/100.
The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 18 points, moving between 20 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1084.9 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 30 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%77
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%90
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%86
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%83
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%91
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 85.
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
Double-drop with vocal chop
Perfectly timed transition from hip-hop groove into heavy dubstep, maintaining vocal energy.
Filter sweep and rhythmic cut
Smooth transition using a high-pass filter to build tension before dropping into a new bass rhythm.
Perfect Drop Swap
strategic_disruption
Minor Level Mismatch
Seamless Atmospheric Blend
intentional_reset
Drop swap on phrase
Perfectly timed energy handoff between two high-intensity tracks.
Quick cut with vocal overlay
Slightly crowded mid-range during the transition, but energy is maintained.
Technical subscores
84
EQ balance
92
Beat alignment
90
Energy control
94
Tempo stability
84
Loudness control
88
Musical coherence
85
Harmonic compatibility
87
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
30 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
214 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
4,557
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
128
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
71
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
892
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (3×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:30, 32:00, 60:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Beat alignment needs work — typical drift of 30 ms
Measured median beat-grid drift is 30 ms across the transitions. Reference: pro ≤ 25 ms, needs work 30-42 ms, must be reworked > 42 ms. Above ~30 ms the kick flams and dancers feel the blend slipping.
Timeline
- 0:45Atmospheric Hook
- 4:45Energy Peak
- 4:08Risky pressure or vibe dip
- 29:45Peak Energy Payoff
- 27:15Mid-Range Clutter
- 28:32Risky pressure or vibe dip
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Mersiv's Mersiv Live Set - Out Of Bounds Tour Fort Lauderdale 2023 get?
- Mersiv Live Set - Out Of Bounds Tour Fort Lauderdale 2023 scores 60/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Mersiv Live Set - Out Of Bounds Tour Fort Lauderdale 2023?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 16m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 77/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Mersiv sets analysed
Similar mid tempo bass sets
- 1788-L — DEADBEATS MIX V2(REZZ / 1788-L / Blanke / k?d / Shadient / Lucille Croft / ATLAST / And More...)79
- 1788-L — Mid-Tempo (REZZ/Deathpact/1788-L)80
- Bassnectar — Bassnectar - Mesmerizing The Ultra [2005]84
- 1788-L — ROAD TO LOST LANDS 2024 : 1788-L VELVET UNDERGROUND TORONTO SET85
- Bassnectar — DREAMTEMPO [1999]86
- Bassnectar — Bassnectar - Mixtape 1387
- Bassnectar — Bassnectar - Immersive Music Mixtape - Side Two87
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research