Mersiv — A Mersiv Moment Downtempo Mixtape

    MID Tempo Bass · 51 min · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    81/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    51 min
    Genre
    MID Tempo Bass

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Mersiv.

    In short

    A Mersiv Moment Downtempo Mixtape by Mersiv scores 81/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (92/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (81/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (2×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:00, 35:20). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:08Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 3:08

      The transition from the ambient intro to the first track is nearly invisible, handled with great spectral care.

    • 7:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 7:15

      New percussive elements are introduced so naturally they feel like part of the original arrangement.

    • 10:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 10:45

      Perfectly transparent blend that feels like a single evolving composition.

    • 14:20Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 14:20

      Clean handover of the low-end frequencies, maintaining momentum.

    • 29:45Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 29:45

      Intentional reset

    About this mid tempo bass set

    A Mersiv Moment Downtempo Mixtape is a mid tempo bass DJ set by Mersiv, running 51 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 81/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 92/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 81/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 13 points, moving between 35 and 75 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 738.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 22 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured79
    Transition Qualitymeasured68
    Phrase Accuracymeasured91
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured88
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured73

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%88
    Narrative ArcAI93
    ProgressionAI87
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI88
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI78

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured91
    PacingAI90
    MomentumAI84
    Peak ManagementAI85
    Energy HandoffAI85
    Fatigue ControlAI52

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%81
    Unexpected MomentsAI80
    ContrastAI81
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI81
    FreshnessAI54
    Surprise ControlAI80

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%92
    Selection QualityAI90
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI93
    ConfidenceAI90
    RestraintAI89
    SignatureAI93

    Energy arc

    10:0041:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    3:08

    Long EQ blend with low-pass filter

    The transition from the ambient intro to the first track is nearly invisible, handled with great spectral care.

    92
    7:15

    Stem-style layering

    New percussive elements are introduced so naturally they feel like part of the original arrangement.

    88
    10:45

    Long melodic crossfade with high-pass filtering

    Perfectly transparent blend that feels like a single evolving composition.

    95
    14:20

    Bass-swap on the downbeat

    Clean handover of the low-end frequencies, maintaining momentum.

    92
    20:45

    Perfect Harmonic Blend

    100
    25:12

    Textural Handoff

    100
    29:45

    Minor Level Drift

    intentional_reset

    82

    Technical subscores

    88

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    85

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    89

    Musical coherence

    92

    Harmonic compatibility

    91

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    22 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    182 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,058

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    108

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    11

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    333

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (2×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:00, 35:20). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 13:15The Deep Drop
    • 18:45Vocal Climax
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Mersiv's A Mersiv Moment Downtempo Mixtape get?
    A Mersiv Moment Downtempo Mixtape scores 81/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is A Mersiv Moment Downtempo Mixtape?
    The analysed recording runs 51 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 92/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 81/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Mersiv sets analysed

    Similar mid tempo bass sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Mersiv analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…