Margaret Dygas — Margaret Dygas ● Submarine SLASH9tv[1]
Indie House · 2h 11m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Margaret Dygas.
In short
Margaret Dygas ● Submarine SLASH9tv[1] by Margaret Dygas scores 78/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (95/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (80/100).
This is DJing as architecture—building a space for the listener to inhabit rather than just a sequence of tracks.
Key takeaways
What worked
- Elite patience and pacing
- Technical precision in long blends
- Sophisticated track selection
- Exceptional technical precision in transitions.
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 6:00, 14:00, 36:00, 46:00, 48:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Continue to explore the 'third track' effect in long blends.
- Use subtle EQ automation to create movement within static loops.
- Experiment with organic field recordings to add warmth to the clinical textures.
- Experiment with brief, high-pass filter resets to create 'air' in the mix.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
A masterfully executed transition that maintains the hypnotic flow.
Smooth handover of high-frequency elements to build energy.
Perfectly executed transition that maintains the hypnotic flow without any audible disruption.
Smooth introduction of new elements that build tension organically.
About this indie house set
Margaret Dygas ● Submarine SLASH9tv[1] is a indie house DJ set by Margaret Dygas, running 2h 11m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 78/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
This is DJing as architecture—building a space for the listener to inhabit rather than just a sequence of tracks.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 80/100.
The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 44 points, moving between 40 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
5 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 221.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
This is DJing as architecture—building a space for the listener to inhabit rather than just a sequence of tracks.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%80
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%89
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%85
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%83
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%95
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 86.
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (5)
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
A masterfully executed transition that maintains the hypnotic flow.
High-pass filter transition
Smooth handover of high-frequency elements to build energy.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly executed transition that maintains the hypnotic flow without any audible disruption.
Mid-range layering and gradual filter opening
Smooth introduction of new elements that build tension organically.
Perfect Blend
Technical subscores
88
EQ balance
92
Beat alignment
87
Energy control
92
Tempo stability
87
Loudness control
91
Musical coherence
88
Harmonic compatibility
90
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
28 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
100 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
7,860
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
90
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
260
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
851
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 6:00, 14:00, 36:00, 46:00, 48:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What SOONOS heard
- Elite patience and pacing
- Technical precision in long blends
- Sophisticated track selection
- Exceptional technical precision in transitions.
- Deep, immersive hypnotic groove.
- Masterful use of restraint and subtle evolution.
- Technical invisibility in transitions.
- Elite-level groove management.
- Consistent, immersive atmosphere.
Timeline
- 04:30Modular Texture Entry
- 08:15Energy Lift
- 16:20Tension Peak
- 21:45Groove Lock
Coaching notes
- Continue to explore the 'third track' effect in long blends.
- Use subtle EQ automation to create movement within static loops.
- Experiment with organic field recordings to add warmth to the clinical textures.
- Experiment with brief, high-pass filter resets to create 'air' in the mix.
- Utilize more dramatic stereo-width automation on synth textures to enhance the immersive feel.
- Consider a slightly more aggressive low-end swap to emphasize the transition points.
- Continue to explore the subtle interplay between percussive layers to deepen the hypnotic effect.
- Maintain the exceptional level of technical precision in your blends.
- Consider introducing a very sparse, atmospheric melodic element to provide a brief point of focus.
- Experiment with even longer blends to further enhance the hypnotic effect.
- Incorporate more organic, field-recorded textures to add human warmth.
- Use subtle filter sweeps to create more dynamic movement within the static loops.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Margaret Dygas's Margaret Dygas ● Submarine SLASH9tv[1] get?
- Margaret Dygas ● Submarine SLASH9tv[1] scores 78/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Margaret Dygas ● Submarine SLASH9tv[1]?
- The analysed recording runs 2h 11m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 80/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Margaret Dygas sets analysed
Similar indie house sets
- Praslea — Podcast 036 / DF Sánchez (Colombia) Recorded live @ warm up for Praslea & Cezar78
- Jamie xx — Jamie xx BBC Radio 1 Essential Mix78
- Superpitcher — Dj set at Copenhagen Karrusel 27 August 202178
- Nicolas Lutz — 027 - Nicolas Lutz - Recorded live from fabric77
- Dewalta — Hannah D @ Inside out with Dewalta X Hannah D 27.1.2377
- Four Tet — Lost Village 23rd August 202579
- Job Jobse — Job Jobse Tribute Mix77
- Onur Ozer — Bex @ Inside Out With Onur Özer 1.10.2380
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research