Margaret Dygas — Margaret Dygas - Air Festival, Switzerland (29.07.2006)

    Indie House · 2h 28m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 28m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Margaret Dygas.

    In short

    Margaret Dygas - Air Festival, Switzerland (29.07.2006) by Margaret Dygas scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (82/100).

    This set is a masterclass in how to maintain a dancefloor's attention through subtle evolution rather than overt peaks.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 19:00, 31:00, 40:00, 53:00, 68:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Continue to explore the subtle interplay between percussive layers.
    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps to create occasional peaks.
    • Maintain the high level of technical precision in the blends.
    • Experiment with more aggressive EQ cuts to create momentary tension.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 04:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 04:45

      A textbook minimal blend. The new percussion enters so subtly it feels like part of the original track.

    • 09:02Measured (DSP)68/100Listen at 09:02

      A slight audible nudge to correct a phase drift. It doesn't break the groove but is noticeable to a trained ear.

    • 12:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 12:15

      Perfectly executed long blend, maintaining the groove while shifting textures.

    • 18:00Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 18:00

      Smooth introduction of new percussive elements, enhancing the existing loop.

    • 24:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 24:12

      A masterfully executed long blend where the transition is almost imperceptible.

    • 29:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 29:45

      Clean execution of a low-frequency swap at the end of a 32-bar phrase.

    About this indie house set

    Margaret Dygas - Air Festival, Switzerland (29.07.2006) is a indie house DJ set by Margaret Dygas, running 2h 28m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This set is a masterclass in how to maintain a dancefloor's attention through subtle evolution rather than overt peaks.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 82/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 63 points, moving between 40 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 315.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This set is a masterclass in how to maintain a dancefloor's attention through subtle evolution rather than overt peaks.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%86
    Beat Alignmentmeasured80
    Transition Qualitymeasured84
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured87
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured90
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%89
    Narrative ArcAI93
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI82

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%83
    Energy Curvemeasured78
    PacingAI94
    MomentumAI91
    Peak ManagementAI85
    Energy HandoffAI87
    Fatigue ControlAI53

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%82
    Unexpected MomentsAI80
    ContrastAI84
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI85
    FreshnessAI52
    Surprise ControlAI80

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI91
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI94
    ConfidenceAI92
    RestraintAI96
    SignatureAI92

    Energy arc

    00:00147:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    04:45

    Long EQ blend, swapping lows over 32 bars

    A textbook minimal blend. The new percussion enters so subtly it feels like part of the original track.

    85
    09:02

    Manual vinyl correction during blend

    A slight audible nudge to correct a phase drift. It doesn't break the groove but is noticeable to a trained ear.

    68
    12:15

    Long EQ blend

    Perfectly executed long blend, maintaining the groove while shifting textures.

    92
    18:00

    Subtle layering

    Smooth introduction of new percussive elements, enhancing the existing loop.

    88
    24:12

    Long EQ blend with subtle low-end handover.

    A masterfully executed long blend where the transition is almost imperceptible.

    92
    29:45

    Phrase-aligned bass swap.

    Clean execution of a low-frequency swap at the end of a 32-bar phrase.

    88

    Technical subscores

    87

    EQ balance

    90

    Beat alignment

    86

    Energy control

    90

    Tempo stability

    86

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    89

    Harmonic compatibility

    89

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    21 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    200 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    8,835

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    20

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    81

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    754

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 19:00, 31:00, 40:00, 53:00, 68:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 04:45The Perfect Blend
    • 09:02Vinyl Drift
    • 14:30Groove Lock
    • 20:15Rhythmic Peak
    • 26:30Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Continue to explore the subtle interplay between percussive layers.
    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps to create occasional peaks.
    • Maintain the high level of technical precision in the blends.
    • Experiment with more aggressive EQ cuts to create momentary tension.
    • Use vocal loops to add a human element to the machine-like rhythms.
    • Vary the length of transitions to keep the listener guessing.
    • Experiment with slightly more aggressive EQ cuts to create momentary tension.
    • Incorporate a vocal snippet to add a human element to the clinical groove.
    • Try a 'double drop' technique to surprise the audience during the peak phase.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Margaret Dygas's Margaret Dygas - Air Festival, Switzerland (29.07.2006) get?
    Margaret Dygas - Air Festival, Switzerland (29.07.2006) scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Margaret Dygas - Air Festival, Switzerland (29.07.2006)?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 28m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 82/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Margaret Dygas sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Margaret Dygas analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.