Lucas & Steve — Lucas & Steve Radio 154
Future House · 60 min · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Lucas & Steve.
In short
Lucas & Steve Radio 154 by Lucas & Steve scores 77/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (87/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (55/100).
This mix demonstrates the power of professional phrasing and EQ management in maintaining a relentless festival groove.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:20, 30:00, 36:00, 44:00, 48:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
- Beat alignment needs work — typical drift of 44 ms — Measured median beat-grid drift is 44 ms across the transitions. Reference: pro ≤ 25 ms, needs work 30-42 ms, must be reworked > 42 ms. Above ~30 ms the kick flams and dancers feel the blend slipping.
What to try next
- Introduce more dynamic range by allowing for longer, quieter breakdowns to make the drops hit harder.
- Experiment with more adventurous track selection to differentiate the set from standard radio formats.
- Use creative FX or live looping to add a unique performance signature to the transitions.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Perfectly timed low-end swap that maintains momentum.
Smooth transition between melodic elements, very professional.
Strategic disruption
Smooth transition into the next vocal track, perfectly timed on the 32-bar mark.
Effective use of filtering to clear space for the incoming track's lead.
About this future house set
Lucas & Steve Radio 154 is a future house DJ set by Lucas & Steve, running 60 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 77/100 overall — solid.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
This mix demonstrates the power of professional phrasing and EQ management in maintaining a relentless festival groove.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 87/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 55/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 30 points, moving between 60 and 94 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
8 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1763.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 44 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
This mix demonstrates the power of professional phrasing and EQ management in maintaining a relentless festival groove.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%55
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%86
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%84
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%79
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%87
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (8)
EQ swap on phrase
Perfectly timed low-end swap that maintains momentum.
Long melodic blend
Smooth transition between melodic elements, very professional.
Perfect Blend
Vocal Handoff
Minor Level Jump
strategic_disruption
Drop Swap
Phrase-aligned EQ blend
Smooth transition into the next vocal track, perfectly timed on the 32-bar mark.
High-pass filter sweep and drop swap
Effective use of filtering to clear space for the incoming track's lead.
Technical subscores
91
EQ balance
97
Beat alignment
88
Energy control
97
Tempo stability
91
Loudness control
89
Musical coherence
91
Harmonic compatibility
93
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
44 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
257 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,561
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
28
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
67
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
54
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:20, 30:00, 36:00, 44:00, 48:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Beat alignment needs work — typical drift of 44 ms
Measured median beat-grid drift is 44 ms across the transitions. Reference: pro ≤ 25 ms, needs work 30-42 ms, must be reworked > 42 ms. Above ~30 ms the kick flams and dancers feel the blend slipping.
Timeline
- 2:45First Drop Impact
- 6:15Melodic Shift
- 26:10Vocal Hook Impact
Coaching notes
- Introduce more dynamic range by allowing for longer, quieter breakdowns to make the drops hit harder.
- Experiment with more adventurous track selection to differentiate the set from standard radio formats.
- Use creative FX or live looping to add a unique performance signature to the transitions.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Lucas & Steve's Lucas & Steve Radio 154 get?
- Lucas & Steve Radio 154 scores 77/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Lucas & Steve Radio 154?
- The analysed recording runs 60 min.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 87/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 55/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Lucas & Steve sets analysed
Similar future house sets
- Tchami — Tchami Live @ Social Club79
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #43174
- Tchami — The Calling Mix Vol.174
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #42781
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #43481
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #42982
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #42582
- Tchami — Tchami - Confessions #283
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research