Lucas & Steve — Lucas & Steve Radio 150
Future House · 60 min · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Lucas & Steve.
In short
Lucas & Steve Radio 150 by Lucas & Steve scores 77/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (88/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (77/100).
Technical perfection is your foundation; now use silence and space as instruments to elevate the emotional payoff.
Key takeaways
What worked
- Flawless technical execution
- High-impact track selection
- Professional gain staging
What weakened the set
- Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (3:08, 10:12).
- Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (19:00, 30:00, 46:00, 48:00, 54:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Introduce more dynamic contrast by including brief lower-energy segments.
- Experiment with more creative layering during transitions to add a unique signature.
- Vary the bassline textures to avoid sub-bass monotony over longer periods.
- Introduce more dynamic energy dips to make the peaks feel even larger.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Perfectly timed transition, maintaining energy and phrase alignment.
Slightly abrupt energy shift, but fits the festival style.
Smooth harmonic transition, blending two melodic themes seamlessly.
Brief frequency overlap in the mids, but quickly resolved.
Perfectly timed vocal handover with no frequency clashing.
High-pass filter used effectively to build tension before the next track's kick re-enters.
Seamless transition with perfect phrase alignment.
About this future house set
Lucas & Steve Radio 150 is a future house DJ set by Lucas & Steve, running 60 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 77/100 overall — solid.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Technical perfection is your foundation; now use silence and space as instruments to elevate the emotional payoff.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 88/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 77/100.
The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 35 points, moving between 70 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1034.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
Technical perfection is your foundation; now use silence and space as instruments to elevate the emotional payoff.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%84
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%85
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%81
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%77
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%88
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 83.
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
8-bar EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly timed transition, maintaining energy and phrase alignment.
Quick cut on the drop
Slightly abrupt energy shift, but fits the festival style.
Long melodic blend
Smooth harmonic transition, blending two melodic themes seamlessly.
EQ swap with slight mid-range clash
Brief frequency overlap in the mids, but quickly resolved.
EQ-balanced long blend
Perfectly timed vocal handover with no frequency clashing.
Filter sweep into drop
High-pass filter used effectively to build tension before the next track's kick re-enters.
EQ blend with low-end swap
Seamless transition with perfect phrase alignment.
Technical subscores
89
EQ balance
95
Beat alignment
87
Energy control
97
Tempo stability
91
Loudness control
88
Musical coherence
90
Harmonic compatibility
92
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
28 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
222 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,573
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
20
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
121
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
74
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Recurring mid-frequency clash
Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (3:08, 10:12).
Long static loops (5×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (19:00, 30:00, 46:00, 48:00, 54:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What SOONOS heard
- Flawless technical execution
- High-impact track selection
- Professional gain staging
Timeline
- 0:30Intro Impact
- 5:45Energy Plateau
- 9:00Vocal Hook Integration
- 3:08Risky pressure or vibe dip
- 10:12Risky pressure or vibe dip
- 15:20Energy Peak
- 20:15Vibe Plateau
Coaching notes
- Introduce more dynamic contrast by including brief lower-energy segments.
- Experiment with more creative layering during transitions to add a unique signature.
- Vary the bassline textures to avoid sub-bass monotony over longer periods.
- Introduce more dynamic energy dips to make the peaks feel even larger.
- Experiment with longer, more complex layering to showcase creative depth.
- Vary the transition techniques to include more rhythmic cuts alongside EQ blends.
- Monitor mid-range frequencies during high-energy segments to prevent listener fatigue.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Lucas & Steve's Lucas & Steve Radio 150 get?
- Lucas & Steve Radio 150 scores 77/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Lucas & Steve Radio 150?
- The analysed recording runs 60 min.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 88/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 77/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Lucas & Steve sets analysed
Similar future house sets
- Tchami — Tchami Live @ Social Club79
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #43174
- Tchami — The Calling Mix Vol.174
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #42781
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #43481
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #42982
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #42582
- Tchami — Tchami - Confessions #283
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research