Lucas & Steve — Lucas & Steve Radio 144

    Future House · 1h 00m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    79/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 00m
    Genre
    Future House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Lucas & Steve.

    In short

    Lucas & Steve Radio 144 by Lucas & Steve scores 79/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (88/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (74/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (4×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (39:45, 45:30, 48:00, 56:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 0:45Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 0:45

      Intentional reset

    • 13:22Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 13:22

      Perfectly executed handover of the low-end frequencies on the phrase change.

    • 17:45Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 17:45

      High-energy transition that utilizes the buildup of one track to launch the drop of the next.

    • 25:45Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 25:45

      Perfectly timed energy handoff, maintaining the driving momentum of the set.

    About this future house set

    Lucas & Steve Radio 144 is a future house DJ set by Lucas & Steve, running 1h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 79/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 88/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 74/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 12 points, moving between 75 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1197.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 27 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured69
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured95
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured90
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%82
    Narrative ArcAI86
    ProgressionAI74
    Tension & ReleaseAI76
    Section AwarenessAI86
    Flow ContinuityAI88
    PayoffAI91

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%79
    Energy Curvemeasured80
    PacingAI80
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI81
    Energy HandoffAI84
    Fatigue ControlAI35

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%74
    Unexpected MomentsAI74
    ContrastAI66
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI87
    FreshnessAI34
    Surprise ControlAI74

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%88
    Selection QualityAI86
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI90
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI68
    SignatureAI88

    Energy arc

    36:0060:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    0:45

    Intro Handoff

    intentional_reset

    100
    4:45

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    9:45

    Perfect Phrase Swap

    100
    13:22

    EQ-balanced long blend

    Perfectly executed handover of the low-end frequencies on the phrase change.

    94
    17:45

    Drop-swap

    High-energy transition that utilizes the buildup of one track to launch the drop of the next.

    90
    25:45

    Short EQ-swap blend on the drop

    Perfectly timed energy handoff, maintaining the driving momentum of the set.

    94

    Technical subscores

    90

    EQ balance

    96

    Beat alignment

    89

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    91

    Loudness control

    89

    Musical coherence

    92

    Harmonic compatibility

    93

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    27 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    223 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,611

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    29

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    146

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    66

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (4×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (39:45, 45:30, 48:00, 56:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 28:15Energy Peak
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Lucas & Steve's Lucas & Steve Radio 144 get?
    Lucas & Steve Radio 144 scores 79/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Lucas & Steve Radio 144?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 00m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 88/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 74/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Lucas & Steve sets analysed

    Similar future house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Lucas & Steve analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.