Lucas & Steve — Lucas & Steve Radio 137

    Future House · 60 min · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    79/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    60 min
    Genre
    Future House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Lucas & Steve.

    In short

    Lucas & Steve Radio 137 by Lucas & Steve scores 79/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (89/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (79/100).

    This segment demonstrates the power of technical perfection in maintaining a high-energy festival atmosphere.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (4×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (36:00, 41:00, 48:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 1:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 1:45

      Perfect transition from the intro/host talk into the main groove.

    • 4:08Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 4:08

      Smooth transition between two high-energy tracks, maintaining vocal clarity.

    • 7:15Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 7:15

      Transparent handover of the kick and sub-bass, preserving the groove.

    • 16:20Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 16:20

      Strategic disruption

    • 25:45Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 25:45

      Seamless transition between two high-energy vocal tracks, perfectly aligned on the 32-bar mark.

    About this future house set

    Lucas & Steve Radio 137 is a future house DJ set by Lucas & Steve, running 60 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 79/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This segment demonstrates the power of technical perfection in maintaining a high-energy festival atmosphere.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 89/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 79/100.

    The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 19 points, moving between 20 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1327.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This segment demonstrates the power of technical perfection in maintaining a high-energy festival atmosphere.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured67
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured90
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%86
    Narrative ArcAI88
    ProgressionAI80
    Tension & ReleaseAI81
    Section AwarenessAI88
    Flow ContinuityAI90
    PayoffAI93

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%83
    Energy Curvemeasured84
    PacingAI82
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI85
    Energy HandoffAI85
    Fatigue ControlAI55

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%79
    Unexpected MomentsAI77
    ContrastAI73
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI88
    FreshnessAI56
    Surprise ControlAI77

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%89
    Selection QualityAI89
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI92
    ConfidenceAI95
    RestraintAI73
    SignatureAI86

    Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 84.

    Energy arc

    0:0059:55

    Transitions analysed (7)

    1:45

    Phrase-aligned drop swap

    Perfect transition from the intro/host talk into the main groove.

    95
    4:08

    EQ-balanced blend over 16 bars

    Smooth transition between two high-energy tracks, maintaining vocal clarity.

    92
    7:15

    Low-end swap on phrase boundary

    Transparent handover of the kick and sub-bass, preserving the groove.

    94
    12:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    16:20

    Minor Level Jump

    strategic_disruption

    82
    21:15

    Flawless Phrase Swap

    100
    25:45

    Vocal-to-vocal phrase swap

    Seamless transition between two high-energy vocal tracks, perfectly aligned on the 32-bar mark.

    94

    Technical subscores

    90

    EQ balance

    96

    Beat alignment

    87

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    93

    Loudness control

    89

    Musical coherence

    92

    Harmonic compatibility

    93

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    28 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    221 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,578

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    28

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    203

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    86

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (4×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (36:00, 41:00, 48:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:45Branded Intro Impact
    • 6:30Energy Plateau
    • 28:30Peak Energy Handoff
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Lucas & Steve's Lucas & Steve Radio 137 get?
    Lucas & Steve Radio 137 scores 79/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Lucas & Steve Radio 137?
    The analysed recording runs 60 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 89/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 79/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Lucas & Steve sets analysed

    Similar future house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Lucas & Steve analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.