Kevin de Vries — Kevin de Vries WE1 | Tomorrowland 2024

    Melodic Techno · 1h 32m · Tomorrowland · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    73/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 32m
    Genre
    Melodic Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Kevin de Vries.

    In short

    Kevin de Vries WE1 | Tomorrowland 2024 by Kevin de Vries scores 73/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (93/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (79/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:00, 57:00, 61:00, 65:00, 80:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Utilize more dramatic filter sweeps during transitions to enhance the sense of movement.
    • Experiment with layering vocal snippets to add a human element to the industrial textures.
    • Consider a 'fake-out' drop to surprise the audience and break the linear energy build.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 4:22Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 4:22

      Perfect transition from the atmospheric intro into the first rhythmic track. The low-end handover is imperceptible.

    • 8:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 8:15

      Smooth transition that maintains the driving energy while introducing a new melodic theme.

    • 12:55Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 12:55

      Perfectly executed transition that maintains the driving momentum without a hint of phase drift.

    • 17:20Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 17:20

      Smooth introduction of new melodic elements while keeping the sub-bass locked.

    • 21:25Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 21:25

      High-impact transition designed for the festival stage; energy handoff is seamless.

    • 23:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 23:45

      Seamless integration of the incoming kick; the transition is almost imperceptible.

    • 28:55Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 28:55

      High-impact transition that resets the energy and introduces a new melodic theme.

    About this melodic techno set

    Kevin de Vries WE1 | Tomorrowland 2024 is a melodic techno DJ set by Kevin de Vries, running 1h 32m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 73/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 79/100.

    The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 31 points, moving between 20 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 634.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%79
    Beat Alignmentmeasured65
    Transition Qualitymeasured59
    Phrase Accuracymeasured95
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured72

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%92
    Narrative ArcAI93
    ProgressionAI90
    Tension & ReleaseAI92
    Section AwarenessAI92
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI95

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%88
    Energy Curvemeasured89
    PacingAI91
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI91
    Energy HandoffAI92
    Fatigue ControlAI57

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%84
    Unexpected MomentsAI82
    ContrastAI85
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI89
    FreshnessAI58
    Surprise ControlAI82

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%93
    Selection QualityAI91
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI94
    ConfidenceAI96
    RestraintAI84
    SignatureAI90

    Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 87.

    Energy arc

    0:0090:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    4:22

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfect transition from the atmospheric intro into the first rhythmic track. The low-end handover is imperceptible.

    94
    8:15

    Progressive layering and high-pass filter swap

    Smooth transition that maintains the driving energy while introducing a new melodic theme.

    92
    12:55

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition that maintains the driving momentum without a hint of phase drift.

    92
    17:20

    Phased layering with high-pass filter sweep

    Smooth introduction of new melodic elements while keeping the sub-bass locked.

    90
    21:25

    Drop swap on the phrase

    High-impact transition designed for the festival stage; energy handoff is seamless.

    88
    23:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Seamless integration of the incoming kick; the transition is almost imperceptible.

    95
    28:55

    Drop swap after short breakdown

    High-impact transition that resets the energy and introduces a new melodic theme.

    92

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    96

    Beat alignment

    92

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    90

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    91

    Harmonic compatibility

    91

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    28 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    200 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,492

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    163

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    39

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    274

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (5×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:00, 57:00, 61:00, 65:00, 80:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:00Cinematic Opening
    • 6:12First Energy Peak
    • 15:45Melodic Hook Entry
    • 19:30Tension Peak
    • 28:15Tension Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Utilize more dramatic filter sweeps during transitions to enhance the sense of movement.
    • Experiment with layering vocal snippets to add a human element to the industrial textures.
    • Consider a 'fake-out' drop to surprise the audience and break the linear energy build.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Kevin de Vries's Kevin de Vries WE1 | Tomorrowland 2024 get?
    Kevin de Vries WE1 | Tomorrowland 2024 scores 73/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Kevin de Vries WE1 | Tomorrowland 2024?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 32m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 79/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Kevin de Vries sets analysed

    Similar melodic techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Kevin de Vries analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.