John Summit — John Summit Live @ Madison Square Garden

    House · 2h 01m · analysed 20 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 01m
    Genre
    House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, John Summit.

    In short

    John Summit Live @ Madison Square Garden by John Summit scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (92/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (81/100).

    This segment showcases the power of digital precision when combined with a deep understanding of arena-scale energy dynamics.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (13:00, 24:00, 30:00, 55:00, 61:45, 79:15). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Practice more aggressive mid-range EQ cuts during fast transitions.
    • Experiment with longer atmospheric breakdowns to create more contrast.
    • Utilize more subtle FX layering to add depth to the percussive sections.
    • Experiment with slightly more complex EQ layering during the mid-set to contrast with the directness of the finale.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 12:42Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 12:42

      Perfectly executed transition; the incoming track's groove is introduced subtly before the full swap.

    • 16:15Measured (DSP)84/100Listen at 16:15

      High-energy switch that uses a high-pass filter to build tension before dropping the new kick.

    • 20:10Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 20:10

      Expertly timed drop where two tracks align for a massive energy payoff.

    • 22:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 22:45

      Perfectly executed transition that maintains the vocal energy while introducing a heavier bassline.

    • 28:12Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 28:12

      High-impact transition designed for maximum crowd reaction; the timing is impeccable.

    About this house set

    John Summit Live @ Madison Square Garden is a house DJ set by John Summit, running 2h 01m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This segment showcases the power of digital precision when combined with a deep understanding of arena-scale energy dynamics.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 92/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 81/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 47 points, moving between 40 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1229.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 27 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This segment showcases the power of digital precision when combined with a deep understanding of arena-scale energy dynamics.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%81
    Beat Alignmentmeasured70
    Transition Qualitymeasured63
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%91
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI89
    Tension & ReleaseAI91
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI91
    PayoffAI96

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%88
    Energy Curvemeasured91
    PacingAI89
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI94
    Energy HandoffAI92
    Fatigue ControlAI52

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI83
    ContrastAI85
    Transition Varietymeasured91
    Selection RiskAI88
    FreshnessAI53
    Surprise ControlAI83

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%92
    Selection QualityAI92
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI94
    ConfidenceAI96
    RestraintAI79
    SignatureAI91

    Energy arc

    11:00120:30

    Transitions analysed (8)

    2:45

    Perfect Drop Handoff

    100
    6:15

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    10:15

    Seamless Melodic Blend

    100
    12:42

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition; the incoming track's groove is introduced subtly before the full swap.

    92
    16:15

    Filter sweep and rhythmic cut

    High-energy switch that uses a high-pass filter to build tension before dropping the new kick.

    84
    20:10

    Double-drop layering

    Expertly timed drop where two tracks align for a massive energy payoff.

    90
    22:45

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filter sweep

    Perfectly executed transition that maintains the vocal energy while introducing a heavier bassline.

    92
    28:12

    Drop swap with impact FX

    High-impact transition designed for maximum crowd reaction; the timing is impeccable.

    94

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    92

    Energy control

    96

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    89

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    27 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    220 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,248

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    116

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    43

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    371

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (13:00, 24:00, 30:00, 55:00, 61:45, 79:15). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 14:50Groove Lock
    • 19:30Tension Peak
    • 20:10Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 29:45Album Single Reveal
    • 25:30Groove Lock
    • 28:12Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Practice more aggressive mid-range EQ cuts during fast transitions.
    • Experiment with longer atmospheric breakdowns to create more contrast.
    • Utilize more subtle FX layering to add depth to the percussive sections.
    • Experiment with slightly more complex EQ layering during the mid-set to contrast with the directness of the finale.
    • Maintain the high-pass filter tension for 4-8 bars longer to further heighten the final drop's impact.
    • Consider a 'fake-out' drop earlier in the closing segment to play with crowd expectations before the true anthem.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does John Summit's John Summit Live @ Madison Square Garden get?
    John Summit Live @ Madison Square Garden scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is John Summit Live @ Madison Square Garden?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 01m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 92/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 81/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More John Summit sets analysed

    Similar house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All John Summit analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…