Todd Terry — Todd Terry Presents InHouse Radio 040

    House · 59 min · analysed 31 Aug 2026 · source: mixcloud.com

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    59 min
    Genre
    House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on mixcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Todd Terry.

    In short

    Todd Terry Presents InHouse Radio 040 by Todd Terry scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (82/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (20:48, 25:12).
    • Long static loops (3×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (27:00, 31:30, 49:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Introduce a strong vocal hook to create a memorable peak.
    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps during transitions.
    • Vary the bassline rhythm to keep the groove from becoming too static.
    • Refine EQ management during vocal-heavy blends to avoid mid-range clutter.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:05Measured (DSP)88/100

      Smooth transition from the intro sequence into the first full track, maintaining the percussive energy.

    • 7:00Measured (DSP)82/100

      A subtle introduction of new rhythmic elements that deepens the groove without a jarring shift.

    • 19:00Measured (DSP)82/100

      Strategic disruption

    • 20:48Measured (DSP)82/100

      Effective transition into a vocal anthem, though the mid-range is slightly crowded for 2 bars.

    • 22:15Measured (DSP)88/100

      Perfectly timed re-entry of the kick drum after a vocal breakdown.

    • 25:12Measured (DSP)80/100

      Two vocal tracks overlapping; creates high energy but risks becoming cluttered.

    About this house set

    Todd Terry Presents InHouse Radio 040 is a house DJ set by Todd Terry, running 59 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 82/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 23 points, moving between 65 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 297.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%87
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured80
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured88
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%88
    Narrative ArcAI90
    ProgressionAI87
    Tension & ReleaseAI82
    Section AwarenessAI88
    Flow ContinuityAI93
    PayoffAI88

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured81
    PacingAI90
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI83
    Energy HandoffAI87
    Fatigue ControlAI62

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%82
    Unexpected MomentsAI80
    ContrastAI79
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI88
    FreshnessAI61
    Surprise ControlAI80

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI92
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI95
    RestraintAI86
    SignatureAI97

    Energy arc

    0:0058:36

    Transitions analysed (8)

    3:05

    EQ-based long blend

    Smooth transition from the intro sequence into the first full track, maintaining the percussive energy.

    88
    7:00

    Percussive layering

    A subtle introduction of new rhythmic elements that deepens the groove without a jarring shift.

    82
    12:12

    Perfect Blend

    100
    16:25

    Seamless EQ Swap

    100
    19:00

    Minor Level Jump

    strategic_disruption

    82
    20:48

    Quick EQ swap on the drop

    Effective transition into a vocal anthem, though the mid-range is slightly crowded for 2 bars.

    82
    22:15

    Breakdown into drop

    Perfectly timed re-entry of the kick drum after a vocal breakdown.

    88
    25:12

    Layered vocal blend

    Two vocal tracks overlapping; creates high energy but risks becoming cluttered.

    80

    Technical subscores

    88

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    88

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    92

    Musical coherence

    85

    Harmonic compatibility

    89

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    220 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,504

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    49

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    57

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    123

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (20:48, 25:12).

    • Long static loops (3×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (27:00, 31:30, 49:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:05Branding Integration
    • 4:30Groove Lock
    • 20:48Vocal Anthem Entry
    • 25:30Keep on Jumping Hook
    • 28:15Percussive Sag
    • 25:12Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Introduce a strong vocal hook to create a memorable peak.
    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps during transitions.
    • Vary the bassline rhythm to keep the groove from becoming too static.
    • Refine EQ management during vocal-heavy blends to avoid mid-range clutter.
    • Introduce more dynamic range by allowing brief moments of atmospheric tension.
    • Experiment with more creative transition techniques beyond standard EQ swaps.
    Listen on Mixcloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Todd Terry's Todd Terry Presents InHouse Radio 040 get?
    Todd Terry Presents InHouse Radio 040 scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Todd Terry Presents InHouse Radio 040?
    The analysed recording runs 59 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 82/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Todd Terry sets analysed

    Similar house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Todd Terry analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.