What score does Joeski's Joeski Live @ Stereobar Montreal Canada 05.13.23 Part 2 get?

Joeski Live @ Stereobar Montreal Canada 05.13.23 Part 2 scores 68/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is Joeski Live @ Stereobar Montreal Canada 05.13.23 Part 2?

The analysed recording runs 2h 30m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 88/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 77/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Joeski

Joeski — Joeski Live @ Stereobar Montreal Canada 05.13.23 Part 2

House · 2h 30m · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

Overall score

68/100

Level

developing

Duration

2h 30m

Genre

House

Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Joeski.

In short

Joeski Live @ Stereobar Montreal Canada 05.13.23 Part 2 by Joeski scores 68/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (88/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (77/100).

Joeski demonstrates that true power in a club set comes from the space between the beats, not just the beats themselves.

Key takeaways

What weakened the set

Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (14:00, 20:00, 46:00, 54:00, 62:00, 82:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

What to try next

Use short, dramatic filter cuts to create micro-tensions.
Experiment with slightly more adventurous track selection to add a 'surprise' element.
Incorporate more mid-range EQ play during long blends to highlight specific percussive elements.
Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps to create tension.

Timestamped insights

Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

02:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 02:15
Very smooth transition that respects the groove continuity.
05:15Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 05:15
Effective layering that builds energy without a jarring shift.
09:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 09:45
Professional execution that maintains the hypnotic state.
13:20Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 13:20
A masterclass in transparency; the tracks merge into a single rhythmic entity.
19:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 19:45
Clean handover of the melodic elements, maintaining the energy floor.
29:40Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 29:40
Intentional artistic

About this house set

Joeski Live @ Stereobar Montreal Canada 05.13.23 Part 2 is a house DJ set by Joeski, running 2h 30m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 68/100 overall — developing.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

Joeski demonstrates that true power in a club set comes from the space between the beats, not just the beats themselves.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 88/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 77/100.

The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 63 points, moving between 30 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 195.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 29 ms.

How this score is built

Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

Joeski demonstrates that true power in a club set comes from the space between the beats, not just the beats themselves.

The 8 dimensions

Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%78

Beat Alignmentmeasured63

Transition Qualitymeasured65

Phrase Accuracymeasured89

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured87

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured93

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured79

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%84

Narrative ArcAI87

ProgressionAI83

Tension & ReleaseAI79

Section AwarenessAI84

Flow ContinuityAI91

PayoffAI82

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%81

Energy Curvemeasured76

PacingAI87

MomentumAI91

Peak ManagementAI80

Energy HandoffAI83

Fatigue ControlAI62

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%77

Unexpected MomentsAI75

ContrastAI75

Transition Varietymeasured90

Selection RiskAI77

FreshnessAI59

Surprise ControlAI75

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%88

Selection QualityAI85

Identity ConsistencyAI95

IntentionalityAI87

ConfidenceAI90

RestraintAI86

SignatureAI83

Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 82.

Energy arc

00:00149:59