Joeski — Joeski Live At Listen Brooklyn NY 02.09.24 Part 1

    House · 1h 06m · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    80/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 06m
    Genre
    House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Joeski.

    In short

    Joeski Live At Listen Brooklyn NY 02.09.24 Part 1 by Joeski scores 80/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (89/100) and the weakest is ENERGY (76/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (3×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (29:00, 55:00, 60:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 4:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 4:12

      A textbook tech-house transition. The incoming track's percussion is introduced subtly, followed by a perfect bass swap on the phrase.

    • 8:58Measured (DSP)89/100Listen at 8:58

      Smooth integration of new rhythmic elements, maintaining the hypnotic state without jarring the listener.

    • 11:45Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 11:45

      Excellent phasing; the two tracks merge into a single rhythmic entity.

    • 15:12Measured (DSP)86/100Listen at 15:12

      Smooth transition of the vocal elements without frequency clashing.

    • 19:30Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 19:30

      Effective use of high-pass filtering to bring in the next track's energy.

    • 26:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 26:45

      A textbook tech-house transition. The incoming track's percussion is introduced so subtly it feels like a natural evolution of the first track.

    About this house set

    Joeski Live At Listen Brooklyn NY 02.09.24 Part 1 is a house DJ set by Joeski, running 1h 06m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 80/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 89/100; the weakest is ENERGY at 76/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 18 points, moving between 75 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 131.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%88
    Beat Alignmentmeasured82
    Transition Qualitymeasured90
    Phrase Accuracymeasured90
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured92
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%85
    Narrative ArcAI87
    ProgressionAI83
    Tension & ReleaseAI80
    Section AwarenessAI86
    Flow ContinuityAI90
    PayoffAI83

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%76
    Energy Curvemeasured76
    PacingAI86
    MomentumAI89
    Peak ManagementAI82
    Energy HandoffAI85
    Fatigue ControlAI15

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%76
    Unexpected MomentsAI82
    ContrastAI78
    Transition Varietymeasured91
    Selection RiskAI80
    FreshnessAI19
    Surprise ControlAI82

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%89
    Selection QualityAI88
    Identity ConsistencyAI94
    IntentionalityAI89
    ConfidenceAI91
    RestraintAI86
    SignatureAI86

    Energy arc

    11:0065:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    4:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    A textbook tech-house transition. The incoming track's percussion is introduced subtly, followed by a perfect bass swap on the phrase.

    92
    8:58

    Percussive layering

    Smooth integration of new rhythmic elements, maintaining the hypnotic state without jarring the listener.

    89
    11:45

    Long percussive blend with low-end swap

    Excellent phasing; the two tracks merge into a single rhythmic entity.

    90
    15:12

    EQ-based mid-range handover

    Smooth transition of the vocal elements without frequency clashing.

    86
    19:30

    Filter-assisted blend

    Effective use of high-pass filtering to bring in the next track's energy.

    82
    26:45

    Long EQ blend with sub-bass handover

    A textbook tech-house transition. The incoming track's percussion is introduced so subtly it feels like a natural evolution of the first track.

    95

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    86

    Energy control

    92

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    88

    Musical coherence

    86

    Harmonic compatibility

    90

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    28 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,929

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    40

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    50

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    97

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (3×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (29:00, 55:00, 60:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 26:45Seamless Sub Swap
    • 27:50Vocal Hook Integration
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Joeski's Joeski Live At Listen Brooklyn NY 02.09.24 Part 1 get?
    Joeski Live At Listen Brooklyn NY 02.09.24 Part 1 scores 80/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Joeski Live At Listen Brooklyn NY 02.09.24 Part 1?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 06m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 89/100, while ENERGY is the lowest at 76/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Joeski sets analysed

    Similar house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Joeski analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.