What score does Indira Paganotto's INDIRA PAGANOTTO : TIME WARP 2025 @ Stage 1 Closing Set get?

INDIRA PAGANOTTO : TIME WARP 2025 @ Stage 1 Closing Set scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is INDIRA PAGANOTTO : TIME WARP 2025 @ Stage 1 Closing Set?

The analysed recording runs 1h 60m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 81/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Indira Paganotto

Indira Paganotto — INDIRA PAGANOTTO : TIME WARP 2025 @ Stage 1 Closing Set

Hard Techno · 1h 60m · Time Warp · analysed 20 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

Overall score

85/100

Level

festival ready

Duration

1h 60m

Genre

Hard Techno

Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Indira Paganotto.

In short

INDIRA PAGANOTTO : TIME WARP 2025 @ Stage 1 Closing Set by Indira Paganotto scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (81/100).

This segment demonstrates how to maintain extreme energy levels without sacrificing narrative flow or technical precision.

Key takeaways

What worked

Unmistakable artistic identity.
Exceptional energy management.
Flawless phrase alignment.

What weakened the set

Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (15:00, 30:45, 72:00, 80:00, 84:00, 91:20). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

What to try next

Experiment with brief 'silence' gaps before major drops to enhance the physical impact.
Layer a subtle atmospheric pad during the final 2 minutes to smooth the transition to silence.
Monitor the 200Hz-400Hz range during the final blend to ensure the psy-bassline remains distinct from the techno kick.

Timestamped insights

Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

2:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 2:15
Perfectly executed introduction of the first rhythmic element under the intro pad.
5:48Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 5:48
High-impact transition that shifts the groove into a more driving psychedelic state.
9:12Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 9:12
Smooth integration of new high-hat patterns to increase energy density.
13:45Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 13:45
Perfectly timed bass handover that keeps the momentum rolling.
20:15Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 20:15
Strategic layering of the operatic vocal over the outgoing track's percussion.
26:00Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 26:00
Seamless integration of a new percussive layer, maintaining the driving energy.

About this hard techno set

INDIRA PAGANOTTO : TIME WARP 2025 @ Stage 1 Closing Set is a hard techno DJ set by Indira Paganotto, running 1h 60m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

This segment demonstrates how to maintain extreme energy levels without sacrificing narrative flow or technical precision.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 81/100.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 33 points, moving between 40 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 644.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 23 ms.

How this score is built

Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

This segment demonstrates how to maintain extreme energy levels without sacrificing narrative flow or technical precision.

The 8 dimensions

Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%81

Beat Alignmentmeasured78

Transition Qualitymeasured60

Phrase Accuracymeasured93

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured88

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured69

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%92

Narrative ArcAI93

ProgressionAI91

Tension & ReleaseAI90

Section AwarenessAI91

Flow ContinuityAI92

PayoffAI97

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%87

Energy Curvemeasured88

PacingAI90

MomentumAI96

Peak ManagementAI92

Energy HandoffAI94

Fatigue ControlAI43

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%83

Unexpected MomentsAI86

ContrastAI83

Transition Varietymeasured94

Selection RiskAI90

FreshnessAI40

Surprise ControlAI86

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%94

Selection QualityAI94

Identity ConsistencyAI98

IntentionalityAI95

ConfidenceAI97

RestraintAI81

SignatureAI95

Energy arc

12:00119:59