Green VelvetGreen Velvet @ Tomorrowland 2011

    Tech House · 1h 00m · Tomorrowland · analysed 19 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    86/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 00m
    Genre
    Tech House

    About this tech house set

    Green Velvet @ Tomorrowland 2011 is a tech house DJ set by Green Velvet, running 1h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 26 points, moving between 75 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    9 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 599.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 6 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%90
    Beat Alignmentmeasured98
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%91
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI88
    Section AwarenessAI91
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI95

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured84
    PacingAI91
    MomentumAI94
    Peak ManagementAI91
    Energy HandoffAI91
    Fatigue ControlAI38

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI87
    ContrastAI85
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI89
    FreshnessAI38
    Surprise ControlAI87

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI94
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI96
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI82
    SignatureAI97

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 89.

    Energy arc

    00:0060:00

    Transitions analysed (9)

    02:15

    Long percussive blend with high-pass filtering

    Perfectly aligned rhythmically, allowing the new groove to take over naturally.

    90
    06:45

    Vocal drop swap

    High-impact transition utilizing the 'Flash' vocal to reset the energy.

    88
    10:30

    EQ-heavy blend

    Smooth transition focusing on mid-range clarity during the overlap.

    82
    13:00

    Perfect Blend

    100
    15:45

    Minor EQ Overlap

    intentional_reset

    82
    18:40

    Sharp Cut

    strategic_disruption

    100
    21:50

    Seamless Handoff

    100
    25:12

    Long percussive blend

    Smooth transition focusing on rhythmic alignment; slight mid-frequency build-up.

    82
    28:45

    Vocal drop swap

    Perfectly timed entry of the vocal hook, shifting the energy into a peak state.

    90

    Technical subscores

    85

    EQ balance

    91

    Beat alignment

    91

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    86

    Loudness control

    87

    Musical coherence

    83

    Harmonic compatibility

    84

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    5.5 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    220.6 ms

    Drift p95

    3,601

    Boundaries detected

    3

    Hard cuts / h

    43

    Clipping events

    26

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (10:30, 25:12).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 32:00, 36:00, 40:00, 46:00, 52:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 28:45Vocal Hook Entry

    Coaching notes

    • Continue leveraging the unique vocal identity to stand out in festival lineups.
    • Refine mid-frequency EQ management during long percussive blends to maintain clarity.
    • Experiment with more dramatic filter releases to capitalize on the Tomorrowland stage size.
    • Continue to leverage signature vocal elements to maintain identity.
    • Experiment with more dramatic dynamic shifts to enhance tension.
    • Maintain the high level of technical precision in transitions.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Green Velvet's Green Velvet @ Tomorrowland 2011 get?
    Green Velvet @ Tomorrowland 2011 scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Green Velvet @ Tomorrowland 2011?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 00m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    Similar tech house sets

    All Green Velvet analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.