Four Tet — Zenith Paris 24th January 2026

    Indie House · 1h 27m · analysed 19 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    75/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 27m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Four Tet.

    In short

    Zenith Paris 24th January 2026 by Four Tet scores 75/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (82/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (71/100).

    This DJ excels at the 'head-nod test,' creating a hypnotic state that would be highly effective in a peak-time club setting.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Technical precision
    • Groove continuity
    • Energy management

    What weakened the set

    • Repeated volume jumps (2×) — Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 2× (09:30, 26:22).
    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (18:30, 26:30, 32:00, 36:00, 40:00, 43:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with more complex and varied build-ups to further heighten the payoff of the drops.
    • Incorporate more interactive elements, such as vocal stabs or unique FX, to further connect with the audience.
    • Explore more unconventional ways to build pressure, such as using silence or ambient textures, to add more depth to the set.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 04:52Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 04:52

      Masterful layering where the incoming percussion is felt before it is heard.

    • 09:30Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 09:30

      Solid technical execution, though the incoming track is slightly louder.

    • 14:10Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 14:10

      Seamless integration of the incoming kick, maintaining the groove perfectly.

    • 18:15Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 18:15

      Smooth transition focusing on the percussive elements, though slightly safe.

    • 22:25Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 22:25

      Seamless transition where the incoming track's percussion slowly replaces the outgoing one.

    • 26:22Measured (DSP)72/100Listen at 26:22

      A slightly abrupt energy jump, though it fits the driving nature of the set.

    About this indie house set

    Zenith Paris 24th January 2026 is a indie house DJ set by Four Tet, running 1h 27m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 75/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ excels at the 'head-nod test,' creating a hypnotic state that would be highly effective in a peak-time club setting.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 82/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 71/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 53 points, moving between 20 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 608.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 19 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This DJ excels at the 'head-nod test,' creating a hypnotic state that would be highly effective in a peak-time club setting.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%79
    Beat Alignmentmeasured82
    Transition Qualitymeasured56
    Phrase Accuracymeasured87
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured90
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured77

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%81
    Narrative ArcAI83
    ProgressionAI81
    Tension & ReleaseAI76
    Section AwarenessAI82
    Flow ContinuityAI87
    PayoffAI78

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%75
    Energy Curvemeasured72
    PacingAI79
    MomentumAI86
    Peak ManagementAI77
    Energy HandoffAI81
    Fatigue ControlAI39

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%71
    Unexpected MomentsAI72
    ContrastAI73
    Transition Varietymeasured85
    Selection RiskAI70
    FreshnessAI41
    Surprise ControlAI72

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%82
    Selection QualityAI78
    Identity ConsistencyAI91
    IntentionalityAI82
    ConfidenceAI84
    RestraintAI77
    SignatureAI73

    Energy arc

    00:0086:38

    Transitions analysed (6)

    04:52

    Long EQ blend with gradual high-pass introduction

    Masterful layering where the incoming percussion is felt before it is heard.

    92
    09:30

    Bass swap on the 32nd bar

    Solid technical execution, though the incoming track is slightly louder.

    85
    14:10

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Seamless integration of the incoming kick, maintaining the groove perfectly.

    90
    18:15

    Mid-frequency focused blend

    Smooth transition focusing on the percussive elements, though slightly safe.

    82
    22:25

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filtering

    Seamless transition where the incoming track's percussion slowly replaces the outgoing one.

    88
    26:22

    Quick EQ swap on the drop

    A slightly abrupt energy jump, though it fits the driving nature of the set.

    72

    Technical subscores

    85

    EQ balance

    91

    Beat alignment

    84

    Energy control

    90

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    83

    Musical coherence

    83

    Harmonic compatibility

    87

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    19 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    237 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,181

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    138

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    61

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    287

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Repeated volume jumps

      Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 2× (09:30, 26:22).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (18:30, 26:30, 32:00, 36:00, 40:00, 43:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Technical precision
    • Groove continuity
    • Energy management

    Timeline

    • 00:45Atmospheric Immersion
    • 07:12Groove Lock
    • 14:20Groove Lock
    • 19:45Energy Plateau
    • 24:15Groove Lock Peak
    • 27:40Mid-Range Clutter
    • 26:22Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with more complex and varied build-ups to further heighten the payoff of the drops.
    • Incorporate more interactive elements, such as vocal stabs or unique FX, to further connect with the audience.
    • Explore more unconventional ways to build pressure, such as using silence or ambient textures, to add more depth to the set.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Four Tet's Zenith Paris 24th January 2026 get?
    Zenith Paris 24th January 2026 scores 75/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Zenith Paris 24th January 2026?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 27m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 82/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 71/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Four Tet sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Four Tet analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.