Four Tet — Lost Village 23rd August 2025

    Indie House · 1h 48m · analysed 19 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    79/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 48m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Four Tet.

    In short

    Lost Village 23rd August 2025 by Four Tet scores 79/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (84/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (76/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (08:08, 22:30).
    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (6:00, 20:00, 36:00, 41:00, 48:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Incorporate more melodic elements to break up long percussive stretches.
    • Use dramatic EQ cuts to create more tension and release.
    • Experiment with track selection that offers more emotional contrast.
    • Maintain the high level of technical precision in transitions.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 04:05Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 04:05

      Perfectly executed transition from ambient intro to the first rhythmic groove.

    • 08:08Measured (DSP)84/100Listen at 08:08

      Smooth integration of new melodic elements over the existing percussive bed.

    • 11:32Measured (DSP)89/100Listen at 11:32

      Clean bass handover at the end of the segment, maintaining momentum.

    • 13:45Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 13:45

      Smooth transition with excellent frequency management; the new bassline enters unnoticed.

    • 18:12Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 18:12

      Clean swap on the downbeat, maintaining the energy flow effectively.

    • 22:30Measured (DSP)75/100Listen at 22:30

      Slightly abrupt transition; the energy shifts a bit too quickly for the established flow.

    • 25:42Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 25:42

      Perfectly executed handover of the sub-frequencies on the 32nd bar.

    About this indie house set

    Lost Village 23rd August 2025 is a indie house DJ set by Four Tet, running 1h 48m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 79/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 84/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 76/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 43 points, moving between 20 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 859.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured82
    Transition Qualitymeasured66
    Phrase Accuracymeasured89
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured92
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%83
    Narrative ArcAI86
    ProgressionAI82
    Tension & ReleaseAI77
    Section AwarenessAI82
    Flow ContinuityAI88
    PayoffAI84

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%80
    Energy Curvemeasured75
    PacingAI81
    MomentumAI89
    Peak ManagementAI82
    Energy HandoffAI83
    Fatigue ControlAI67

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%76
    Unexpected MomentsAI75
    ContrastAI74
    Transition Varietymeasured89
    Selection RiskAI74
    FreshnessAI64
    Surprise ControlAI75

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%84
    Selection QualityAI82
    Identity ConsistencyAI94
    IntentionalityAI84
    ConfidenceAI86
    RestraintAI76
    SignatureAI74

    Energy arc

    0:00108:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    04:05

    Long atmospheric blend

    Perfectly executed transition from ambient intro to the first rhythmic groove.

    92
    08:08

    EQ-based layering

    Smooth integration of new melodic elements over the existing percussive bed.

    84
    11:32

    Low-end swap

    Clean bass handover at the end of the segment, maintaining momentum.

    89
    13:45

    Long EQ blend

    Smooth transition with excellent frequency management; the new bassline enters unnoticed.

    90
    18:12

    Phrase-aligned cut

    Clean swap on the downbeat, maintaining the energy flow effectively.

    82
    22:30

    Quick EQ swap

    Slightly abrupt transition; the energy shifts a bit too quickly for the established flow.

    75
    25:42

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed handover of the sub-frequencies on the 32nd bar.

    92

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    91

    Beat alignment

    85

    Energy control

    92

    Tempo stability

    84

    Loudness control

    85

    Musical coherence

    85

    Harmonic compatibility

    89

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    221 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,474

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    105

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    69

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    360

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (08:08, 22:30).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (6:00, 20:00, 36:00, 41:00, 48:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 00:45Atmospheric Immersion
    • 06:15Filter Tension
    • 22:30Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Incorporate more melodic elements to break up long percussive stretches.
    • Use dramatic EQ cuts to create more tension and release.
    • Experiment with track selection that offers more emotional contrast.
    • Maintain the high level of technical precision in transitions.
    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps to build tension.
    • Incorporate subtle melodic elements to provide emotional contrast.
    • Use vocal stabs to create memorable moments for the crowd.
    • Incorporate more melodic breakdowns to create dynamic contrast.
    • Experiment with creative FX (delays, filters) to add a unique signature to transitions.
    • Vary the percussive textures to avoid long-term monotony in extended sets.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Four Tet's Lost Village 23rd August 2025 get?
    Lost Village 23rd August 2025 scores 79/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Lost Village 23rd August 2025?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 48m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 84/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 76/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Four Tet sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Four Tet analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…