What score does Excision's Excision - Shambhala 2015 Mix get?

Excision - Shambhala 2015 Mix scores 80/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is Excision - Shambhala 2015 Mix?

The analysed recording runs 1h 24m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 83/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Excision

Excision — Excision - Shambhala 2015 Mix

Dubstep · 1h 24m · analysed 20 Aug 2026

Overall score

80/100

Level

club ready

Duration

1h 24m

Genre

Dubstep

About this dubstep set

Excision - Shambhala 2015 Mix is a dubstep DJ set by Excision, running 1h 24m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 80/100 overall — club ready.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

The DJ uses energy as a narrative tool, creating a relentless but coherent story.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 83/100.

The final score is capped by measured bm: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 21 points, moving between 40 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 793.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

The DJ uses energy as a narrative tool, creating a relentless but coherent story.

The 8 dimensions

Technical precision0

Track selection0

Energy arc0

Crowd control0

Harmonic depth0

Groove patience0

Creativity0

Signature0

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%83

Beat Alignmentmeasured68

Transition Qualitymeasured75

Phrase Accuracymeasured95

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured87

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%94

Narrative ArcAI94

ProgressionAI92

Tension & ReleaseAI93

Section AwarenessAI94

Flow ContinuityAI91

PayoffAI98

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%88

Energy Curvemeasured87

PacingAI91

MomentumAI97

Peak ManagementAI95

Energy HandoffAI96

Fatigue ControlAI51

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%87

Unexpected MomentsAI88

ContrastAI87

Transition Varietymeasured96

Selection RiskAI94

FreshnessAI53

Surprise ControlAI88

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%94

Selection QualityAI94

Identity ConsistencyAI98

IntentionalityAI97

ConfidenceAI98

RestraintAI77

SignatureAI96

Final score capped by measured execution (bm) — weighted average was 89.

Energy arc

24:0083:42

Transitions analysed (6)

2:15

Perfect Double Drop

strategic_disruption

100

5:45

Minor EQ Overlap

9:40

Cinematic Handoff

intentional_reset

100

13:22

Double-drop with high-pass swap

Perfectly timed impact where the new bassline takes over the sub-frequencies instantly.

17:45

Long stem overlap into breakdown

The outgoing vocal melody lingers perfectly over the incoming atmospheric pads.

25:12

Double-drop with high-pass filter swap

Perfectly executed energy handoff between two aggressive basslines.

Technical subscores

EQ balance

Beat alignment

Energy control

Tempo stability

Loudness control

Musical coherence

Harmonic compatibility

Transition cleanliness

Measured (DSP)

27.5 ms

Beat-grid drift (median)

201.5 ms

Drift p95

5,005

Boundaries detected

Hard cuts / h

5936

Clipping events

386

Level jumps

Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.

Recurring patterns

Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (28:30, 34:00, 48:00, 52:00, 58:00, 72:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

Timeline

15:12The Triple Layer
20:30Rhythmic Switch-up
27:08Triple Layer Peak

Coaching notes

Continue to push the boundaries of layering density.
Explore more melodic contrast in atmospheric bridges.
Maintain the high level of technical precision.

Listen on SoundCloud

Curious how your own set scores?

Questions about this analysis

What score does Excision's Excision - Shambhala 2015 Mix get?: Excision - Shambhala 2015 Mix scores 80/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
How long is Excision - Shambhala 2015 Mix?: The analysed recording runs 1h 24m.
Which part of the mix scores best?: IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 83/100.
How is this score calculated?: SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

More Excision sets analysed

Similar dubstep sets

All Excision analyses