Doctor P — 2026.06.02 DOCTOR P DJ

    Dubstep · 1h 07m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    67/100
    Level
    developing
    Duration
    1h 07m
    Genre
    Dubstep

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Doctor P.

    In short

    2026.06.02 DOCTOR P DJ by Doctor P scores 67/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (82/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (65/100).

    This DJ is a master of the 'groove lock', capable of keeping a floor moving for hours through technical consistency and rhythmic focus.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (1×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (16:45). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Focus on creating more dynamic tension by using EQ and filters more aggressively during transitions.
    • Diversify track selection to include more melodic or unexpected elements to break the tech-house monotony.
    • Practice layering vocal samples more rhythmically to avoid mid-range clutter.
    • Work on the macro-arc of the set to ensure energy builds toward a clear peak.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 4:22Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 4:22

      Smooth transition with well-timed bass swap; maintains the groove effectively.

    • 9:10Measured (DSP)74/100Listen at 9:10

      Solid technical execution, though the incoming track's vocal elements clash slightly with the outgoing percussion.

    • 14:12Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 14:12

      Smooth integration of the incoming percussion loop over the outgoing bassline.

    • 18:45Measured (DSP)72/100Listen at 18:45

      Slightly early bass swap leads to a minor dip in energy before the new groove locks.

    • 24:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 24:15

      Smooth low handover on the downbeat, no flam, energy preserved.

    • 28:00Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 28:00

      Clean integration of new melodic elements over the existing groove.

    About this dubstep set

    2026.06.02 DOCTOR P DJ is a dubstep DJ set by Doctor P, running 1h 07m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 67/100 overall — developing.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ is a master of the 'groove lock', capable of keeping a floor moving for hours through technical consistency and rhythmic focus.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 82/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 65/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 29 points, moving between 40 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 228.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This DJ is a master of the 'groove lock', capable of keeping a floor moving for hours through technical consistency and rhythmic focus.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured81
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured79
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured87
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%73
    Narrative ArcAI75
    ProgressionAI73
    Tension & ReleaseAI68
    Section AwarenessAI73
    Flow ContinuityAI79
    PayoffAI72

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%70
    Energy Curvemeasured67
    PacingAI68
    MomentumAI81
    Peak ManagementAI66
    Energy HandoffAI74
    Fatigue ControlAI66

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%65
    Unexpected MomentsAI62
    ContrastAI62
    Transition Varietymeasured82
    Selection RiskAI62
    FreshnessAI56
    Surprise ControlAI62

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%73
    Selection QualityAI70
    Identity ConsistencyAI88
    IntentionalityAI71
    ConfidenceAI75
    RestraintAI64
    SignatureAI63

    Energy arc

    0:0056:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    4:22

    32-bar EQ blend, low swap on phrase

    Smooth transition with well-timed bass swap; maintains the groove effectively.

    82
    9:10

    Percussive layering with mid-range EQ fade

    Solid technical execution, though the incoming track's vocal elements clash slightly with the outgoing percussion.

    74
    14:12

    Long EQ blend

    Smooth integration of the incoming percussion loop over the outgoing bassline.

    85
    18:45

    Bass swap

    Slightly early bass swap leads to a minor dip in energy before the new groove locks.

    72
    24:15

    32-bar EQ blend, low swap on phrase

    Smooth low handover on the downbeat, no flam, energy preserved.

    88
    28:00

    EQ-based layering with mid-frequency focus

    Clean integration of new melodic elements over the existing groove.

    82

    Technical subscores

    79

    EQ balance

    85

    Beat alignment

    75

    Energy control

    87

    Tempo stability

    79

    Loudness control

    76

    Musical coherence

    77

    Harmonic compatibility

    82

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    104 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    4,015

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    74

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    73

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    156

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (1×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (16:45). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 2:15Groove Lock
    • 6:45Energy Plateau
    • 18:45Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 26:45Groove Lock Point
    • 30:00Energy Plateau

    Coaching notes

    • Focus on creating more dynamic tension by using EQ and filters more aggressively during transitions.
    • Diversify track selection to include more melodic or unexpected elements to break the tech-house monotony.
    • Practice layering vocal samples more rhythmically to avoid mid-range clutter.
    • Work on the macro-arc of the set to ensure energy builds toward a clear peak.
    • Incorporate more melodic or harmonic variation to add depth to the percussive groove.
    • Experiment with more dramatic tension-building techniques like longer filter sweeps or reverb washes.
    • Vary the transition lengths to create a more dynamic narrative arc.
    • Use strategic breakdowns to create 'hands-up' moments and increase crowd payoff.
    • Introduce more dramatic breakdowns to create tension and release.
    • Experiment with layering vocals from incoming tracks earlier in the blend.
    • Use filter sweeps more aggressively to signal energy shifts.
    • Incorporate a brief atmospheric reset to prevent energy fatigue.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Doctor P's 2026.06.02 DOCTOR P DJ get?
    2026.06.02 DOCTOR P DJ scores 67/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is 2026.06.02 DOCTOR P DJ?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 07m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 82/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 65/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Doctor P sets analysed

    Similar dubstep sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Doctor P analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…