Doctor P — 2026.02.01 DOCTOR P DJ
Dubstep · 1h 17m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Doctor P.
In short
2026.02.01 DOCTOR P DJ by Doctor P scores 71/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (86/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (68/100).
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (1×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (70:15). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Incorporate more mid-range EQ carving during vocal overlaps to ensure clarity.
- Use short, rhythmic loops of the incoming track to build tension before the full blend.
- Experiment with adding a subtle delay effect on vocal tails during transitions for a more atmospheric feel.
- Use longer breakdowns to reset energy.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Smooth transition with precise phrase matching and clean low-end swap.
Effective use of high-pass filtering to bring in the new track's percussion.
Excellent management of vocal frequencies during the overlap.
Clean energy handoff, though the incoming track is slightly louder.
Beautifully executed transition that feels like a single track evolving.
Seamless transition that feels like a single extended track.
Effective use of a breakdown to introduce a new narrative element.
About this dubstep set
2026.02.01 DOCTOR P DJ is a dubstep DJ set by Doctor P, running 1h 17m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 71/100 overall — solid.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 86/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 68/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 31 points, moving between 40 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 125.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 19 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%86
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%75
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%73
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%68
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%77
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
32-bar EQ blend
Smooth transition with precise phrase matching and clean low-end swap.
Filter-assisted blend
Effective use of high-pass filtering to bring in the new track's percussion.
Long EQ blend with high-pass filtering
Excellent management of vocal frequencies during the overlap.
Bass swap on the 1st beat of the phrase
Clean energy handoff, though the incoming track is slightly louder.
Harmonic blend with mid-range layering
Beautifully executed transition that feels like a single track evolving.
Long EQ blend with phrase-perfect low swap
Seamless transition that feels like a single extended track.
Breakdown transition into spoken word
Effective use of a breakdown to introduce a new narrative element.
Technical subscores
80
EQ balance
88
Beat alignment
77
Energy control
89
Tempo stability
80
Loudness control
78
Musical coherence
82
Harmonic compatibility
83
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
19 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
41 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
4,592
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
9
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
183
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
38
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (1×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (70:15). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 0:15Intro Hook
- 5:20Energy Plateau
- 13:15Vocal Peak
- 17:40Energy Plateau
- 24:15Vocal Synergy
- 28:30Risky pressure or vibe dip
Coaching notes
- Incorporate more mid-range EQ carving during vocal overlaps to ensure clarity.
- Use short, rhythmic loops of the incoming track to build tension before the full blend.
- Experiment with adding a subtle delay effect on vocal tails during transitions for a more atmospheric feel.
- Use longer breakdowns to reset energy.
- Experiment with more instrumental tracks to balance the vocal-heavy selection.
- Vary transition lengths to add more narrative depth.
- Monitor mid-frequency buildup during long blends.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Doctor P's 2026.02.01 DOCTOR P DJ get?
- 2026.02.01 DOCTOR P DJ scores 71/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is 2026.02.01 DOCTOR P DJ?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 17m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 86/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 68/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Doctor P sets analysed
Similar dubstep sets
- Modestep — Blast From The Past [Free Mixtape]71
- Subtronics — Subtronics - Zombie Apocalypse Festival 202670
- Modestep — #BESTOF201368
- Zomboy — Zomboy - Live @ EDC Las Vegas 201874
- Trampa — Ni que hagan trampa es Valencia y ya🥷🏻🤓✨- YosnaPalacios68
- Modestep — Modestep Mix Archive Vol. 12 (UKG Special) - ALBUM OUT NOW74
- Modestep — Best Of 201667
- Modestep — #BESTOF201177
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research