DJ Stingray — Dj Stingray Live On Instagram

    Electro Techno · 1h 14m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    86/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 14m
    Genre
    Electro Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, DJ Stingray.

    In short

    Dj Stingray Live On Instagram by DJ Stingray scores 86/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (95/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (82/100).

    This is how you use speed as a narrative tool without losing the groove.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Exceptional rhythmic layering
    • Unmistakable artistic identity
    • Flawless energy maintenance

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (06:10, 26:40).
    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 7:30, 27:00, 32:00, 36:00, 42:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with a 60-second atmospheric break to reset ear fatigue.
    • Utilize more extreme high-pass filter sweeps to create artificial tension before drops.
    • Incorporate a few 'classic' Detroit stabs to lean further into the heritage aesthetic.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 03:22Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 03:22

      Seamless handover of the low-end, maintaining the 140 BPM drive perfectly.

    • 06:10Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 06:10

      Slight audible flamming for 2 bars, quickly corrected. Adds to the 'live' energy.

    • 11:52Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 11:52

      Strategic disruption

    • 16:28Measured (DSP)64/100Listen at 16:28

      Intentional reset

    • 22:15Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 22:15

      Precise and energetic handoff.

    • 26:40Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 26:40

      Smooth integration of industrial textures.

    About this electro techno set

    Dj Stingray Live On Instagram is a electro techno DJ set by DJ Stingray, running 1h 14m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This is how you use speed as a narrative tool without losing the groove.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 82/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 30 points, moving between 85 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 103.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 15 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This is how you use speed as a narrative tool without losing the groove.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%86
    Beat Alignmentmeasured88
    Transition Qualitymeasured89
    Phrase Accuracymeasured90
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured84
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured85
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured72

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI92
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI93
    PayoffAI92

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured83
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI85
    Energy HandoffAI94
    Fatigue ControlAI43

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%82
    Unexpected MomentsAI84
    ContrastAI78
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI92
    FreshnessAI42
    Surprise ControlAI84

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%95
    Selection QualityAI95
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI97
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI86
    SignatureAI97

    Energy arc

    00:0073:41

    Transitions analysed (8)

    03:22

    Fast EQ swap on phrase

    Seamless handover of the low-end, maintaining the 140 BPM drive perfectly.

    90
    06:10

    Short blend with manual correction

    Slight audible flamming for 2 bars, quickly corrected. Adds to the 'live' energy.

    78
    11:52

    Fast Percussive Blend

    strategic_disruption

    82
    14:05

    Perfect Rhythmic Lock

    100
    16:28

    Manual Pitch Correction

    intentional_reset

    64
    18:40

    High-Hat Layering

    82
    22:15

    Fast EQ swap on the 1

    Precise and energetic handoff.

    90
    26:40

    Long percussive blend

    Smooth integration of industrial textures.

    85

    Technical subscores

    84

    EQ balance

    82

    Beat alignment

    91

    Energy control

    85

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    88

    Musical coherence

    76

    Harmonic compatibility

    83

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    15 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    42 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    4,404

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    43

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    98

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    123

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (06:10, 26:40).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 7:30, 27:00, 32:00, 36:00, 42:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Exceptional rhythmic layering
    • Unmistakable artistic identity
    • Flawless energy maintenance

    Timeline

    • 00:45Energy Lock
    • 08:50Vibe Shift
    • 06:10Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 16:28Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 24:15Rhythmic Lock
    • 29:50Peak Density

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with a 60-second atmospheric break to reset ear fatigue.
    • Utilize more extreme high-pass filter sweeps to create artificial tension before drops.
    • Incorporate a few 'classic' Detroit stabs to lean further into the heritage aesthetic.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does DJ Stingray's Dj Stingray Live On Instagram get?
    Dj Stingray Live On Instagram scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Dj Stingray Live On Instagram?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 14m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 82/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More DJ Stingray sets analysed

    Similar electro techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All DJ Stingray analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.