Daniel Avery — Daniel Avery - Mixmag Cover Mix // 2018

    Indie House · 1h 33m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 33m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Daniel Avery.

    In short

    Daniel Avery - Mixmag Cover Mix // 2018 by Daniel Avery scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (96/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (83/100).

    Avery demonstrates that true energy comes from the tension between sound and silence.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 35:00, 40:00, 46:00, 50:45, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Study the use of white noise as a tension-building tool.
    • Analyze the long blend at 84:15 for textural layering techniques.
    • Observe how the energy is sustained without traditional drops.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 5:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 5:45

      Perfectly executed transition where the new track's atmosphere absorbs the previous one.

    • 10:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 10:12

      Smooth transition that maintains the hypnotic state while introducing new rhythmic complexity.

    • 16:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 16:15

      A masterfully executed transition where the incoming track's percussion subtly replaces the outgoing one over 64 bars.

    • 21:00Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 21:00

      Clean bass handover that maintains the momentum perfectly.

    • 24:45Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 24:45

      A masterclass in frequency management; the new percussive layer enters like it was always there.

    • 29:30Measured (DSP)91/100Listen at 29:30

      Perfectly timed bass handover. The energy remains constant while the groove evolves.

    About this indie house set

    Daniel Avery - Mixmag Cover Mix // 2018 is a indie house DJ set by Daniel Avery, running 1h 33m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Avery demonstrates that true energy comes from the tension between sound and silence.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 35 points, moving between 30 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1134.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 25 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    Avery demonstrates that true energy comes from the tension between sound and silence.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%86
    Beat Alignmentmeasured75
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI95
    ProgressionAI90
    Tension & ReleaseAI86
    Section AwarenessAI92
    Flow ContinuityAI96
    PayoffAI81

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%86
    Energy Curvemeasured85
    PacingAI94
    MomentumAI91
    Peak ManagementAI87
    Energy HandoffAI89
    Fatigue ControlAI53

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI83
    ContrastAI84
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI88
    FreshnessAI53
    Surprise ControlAI83

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%96
    Selection QualityAI94
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI96
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI97
    SignatureAI95

    Energy arc

    0:0090:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    5:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition where the new track's atmosphere absorbs the previous one.

    95
    10:12

    Atmospheric layering and filter sweep

    Smooth transition that maintains the hypnotic state while introducing new rhythmic complexity.

    92
    16:15

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filtering

    A masterfully executed transition where the incoming track's percussion subtly replaces the outgoing one over 64 bars.

    92
    21:00

    Low-end swap on the 1st beat of the phrase

    Clean bass handover that maintains the momentum perfectly.

    88
    24:45

    Long spectral blend

    A masterclass in frequency management; the new percussive layer enters like it was always there.

    94
    29:30

    Low-end swap on phrase

    Perfectly timed bass handover. The energy remains constant while the groove evolves.

    91

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    95

    Beat alignment

    88

    Energy control

    96

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    93

    Musical coherence

    90

    Harmonic compatibility

    92

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    25 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    218 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,553

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    8

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    88

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    391

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 35:00, 40:00, 46:00, 50:45, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 2:30Atmospheric Immersion
    • 8:15Groove Lock-in
    • 14:30Textural Evolution
    • 19:45Tension Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Study the use of white noise as a tension-building tool.
    • Analyze the long blend at 84:15 for textural layering techniques.
    • Observe how the energy is sustained without traditional drops.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Daniel Avery's Daniel Avery - Mixmag Cover Mix // 2018 get?
    Daniel Avery - Mixmag Cover Mix // 2018 scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Daniel Avery - Mixmag Cover Mix // 2018?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 33m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Daniel Avery sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Daniel Avery analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.