Cristian VogelCristian.Vogel.live.@.Alte.Papierfabrik.Rodersdorf.01.05.2004

    Indie House · 2h 14m · analysed 22 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 14m
    Genre
    Indie House

    About this indie house set

    Cristian.Vogel.live.@.Alte.Papierfabrik.Rodersdorf.01.05.2004 is a indie house DJ set by Cristian Vogel, running 2h 14m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ treats the mix as a single, evolving instrument, where transitions are not just handovers but essential parts of the musical composition.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 81/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 43 points, moving between 75 and 94 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 435.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This DJ treats the mix as a single, evolving instrument, where transitions are not just handovers but essential parts of the musical composition.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured82
    Transition Qualitymeasured85
    Phrase Accuracymeasured88
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured88
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured64

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI90
    Tension & ReleaseAI88
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI87

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%83
    Energy Curvemeasured79
    PacingAI90
    MomentumAI91
    Peak ManagementAI86
    Energy HandoffAI90
    Fatigue ControlAI46

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%81
    Unexpected MomentsAI83
    ContrastAI81
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI87
    FreshnessAI45
    Surprise ControlAI83

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI94
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI87
    SignatureAI95

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 86.

    Energy arc

    22:00133:50

    Transitions analysed (8)

    3:12

    Percussive Layering

    strategic_disruption

    82
    7:50

    EQ Swap Peak

    100
    10:10

    Industrial Shift

    intentional_reset

    64
    12:15

    Long percussive blend

    Slight phase drift in the hats, typical of manual vinyl beatmatching, but the groove remains intact.

    72
    17:40

    EQ-based layering

    Smooth transition of the low-end; the new kick replaces the old one without a drop in pressure.

    88
    22:28

    Long percussive blend

    Smooth integration of a new rhythmic layer, maintaining the driving momentum.

    85
    25:12

    Fast EQ swap on vinyl

    A slightly abrupt transition where the incoming kick dominates quickly, causing a minor energy wobble.

    72
    28:45

    Additive layering with filter sweep

    Masterful build-up where the incoming track is filtered in, creating intense tension before the full groove locks.

    92

    Technical subscores

    85

    EQ balance

    84

    Beat alignment

    88

    Energy control

    88

    Tempo stability

    86

    Loudness control

    86

    Musical coherence

    79

    Harmonic compatibility

    83

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    19.5 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    180.9 ms

    Drift p95

    8,011

    Boundaries detected

    30

    Hard cuts / h

    116

    Clipping events

    557

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring phase misalignment

      Beats drifting out of phase produce flammed kicks that read as sloppy. Detected 2× (12:15, 25:12).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (30:00, 33:00, 38:15, 45:00, 49:00, 67:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 10:10Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 12:15Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 24:15Textural Peak
    • 27:50Rhythmic Tension
    • 25:12Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Continue exploring the boundaries of rhythmic dissonance.
    • Experiment with more extreme stereo imaging for percussive elements.
    • Consider a brief 'reset' moment to provide contrast to the relentless drive.
    • Experiment with even longer, more gradual EQ blends to further blur the lines between tracks.
    • Use subtle reverb or delay throws on percussive elements to add depth during transitions.
    • Consider a brief, near-silent breakdown around the 95-minute mark to reset the energy for the final build.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Cristian Vogel's Cristian.Vogel.live.@.Alte.Papierfabrik.Rodersdorf.01.05.2004 get?
    Cristian.Vogel.live.@.Alte.Papierfabrik.Rodersdorf.01.05.2004 scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Cristian.Vogel.live.@.Alte.Papierfabrik.Rodersdorf.01.05.2004?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 14m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 81/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Cristian Vogel sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    All Cristian Vogel analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.