What score does Charlotte de Witte's Charlotte de Witte at Tomorrowland (Daybreak Session 2025) get?

Charlotte de Witte at Tomorrowland (Daybreak Session 2025) scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 84/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Charlotte de Witte

Charlotte de Witte — Charlotte de Witte at Tomorrowland (Daybreak Session 2025)

Hard Techno · 2h 13m · Tomorrowland · analysed 18 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

Overall score

87/100

Level

festival ready

Duration

2h 13m

Genre

Hard Techno

Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Charlotte de Witte.

In short

Charlotte de Witte at Tomorrowland (Daybreak Session 2025) by Charlotte de Witte scores 87/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (84/100).

The DJ's ability to maintain tension through subtle frequency manipulation is a hallmark of professional mastery.

Key takeaways

What worked

Technical precision
Energy management
Selection coherence

What weakened the set

Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 16:00, 30:00, 50:00, 56:00, 72:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

What to try next

Introduce a melodic element earlier in the set to create a more diverse emotional arc.
Experiment with slightly more aggressive EQ cuts to create sharper transitions in high-energy sections.
Use vocal snippets to provide a human element to the mechanical groove.
Experiment with brief moments of total silence before major drops to further enhance the physical impact.

Timestamped insights

Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

4:12Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 4:12
A masterfully executed transition where the new rhythmic element emerges organically from the ambient wash.
8:58Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 8:58
Seamless handover of the low-end energy. The groove remains completely undisturbed.
13:15Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 13:15
Perfectly executed transition, the new kick takes over without any phase issues.
18:40Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 18:40
Smooth transition using high-pass filters to bridge the two tracks.
25:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 25:45
Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the driving energy without any phase issues.
29:42Measured (DSP)84/100Listen at 29:42
Aggressive but effective transition that keeps the momentum high for the festival crowd.

About this hard techno set

Charlotte de Witte at Tomorrowland (Daybreak Session 2025) is a hard techno DJ set by Charlotte de Witte, running 2h 13m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

The DJ's ability to maintain tension through subtle frequency manipulation is a hallmark of professional mastery.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 84/100.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 56 points, moving between 20 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 428.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 17 ms.

How this score is built

Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

The DJ's ability to maintain tension through subtle frequency manipulation is a hallmark of professional mastery.

The 8 dimensions

Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%84

Beat Alignmentmeasured86

Transition Qualitymeasured60

Phrase Accuracymeasured94

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured91

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%92

Narrative ArcAI93

ProgressionAI90

Tension & ReleaseAI89

Section AwarenessAI92

Flow ContinuityAI94

PayoffAI92

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%87

Energy Curvemeasured84

PacingAI92

MomentumAI95

Peak ManagementAI92

Energy HandoffAI91

Fatigue ControlAI59

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%84

Unexpected MomentsAI82

ContrastAI84

Transition Varietymeasured94

Selection RiskAI89

FreshnessAI60

Surprise ControlAI82

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%94

Selection QualityAI92

Identity ConsistencyAI98

IntentionalityAI95

ConfidenceAI96

RestraintAI87

SignatureAI93

Energy arc

0:00132:39