Ben UFOPitch Perfect 2023 EP.002 — Ben UFO

    Indie House · 2h 26m · analysed 21 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    86/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 26m
    Genre
    Indie House

    About this indie house set

    Pitch Perfect 2023 EP.002 — Ben UFO is a indie house DJ set by Ben UFO, running 2h 26m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ understands that in techno, the space between the beats is as important as the beats themselves.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 82/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 89 points, moving between 40 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 783.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 25 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This DJ understands that in techno, the space between the beats is as important as the beats themselves.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured75
    Transition Qualitymeasured59
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured91
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%91
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI88
    Section AwarenessAI92
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI85

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%87
    Energy Curvemeasured81
    PacingAI94
    MomentumAI92
    Peak ManagementAI88
    Energy HandoffAI89
    Fatigue ControlAI69

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%87
    Unexpected MomentsAI87
    ContrastAI87
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI89
    FreshnessAI69
    Surprise ControlAI87

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%96
    Selection QualityAI95
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI96
    ConfidenceAI95
    RestraintAI94
    SignatureAI96

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 88.

    Energy arc

    0:00145:57

    Transitions analysed (8)

    3:05

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Seamless transition where the new bassline emerges naturally from the previous track's tail.

    94
    7:07

    Percussive layering and mid-frequency swap

    Smooth transition that maintains the hypnotic state while introducing new rhythmic textures.

    88
    10:10

    Quick EQ swap on the downbeat

    A more decisive transition that signals a shift in the set's energy level.

    92
    12:15

    Perfect Blend

    100
    16:20

    Minor EQ Overlap

    strategic_disruption

    82
    20:45

    Seamless Phasing

    100
    23:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    A masterclass in transparency; the transition is felt through the shifting texture of the percussion rather than a sudden change in energy.

    92
    28:12

    High-pass filter sweep and drop

    Builds significant tension through the mid-range before dropping into a stripped-back, heavy groove.

    88

    Technical subscores

    91

    EQ balance

    95

    Beat alignment

    90

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    90

    Loudness control

    94

    Musical coherence

    89

    Harmonic compatibility

    93

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    24.9 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    241.1 ms

    Drift p95

    8,738

    Boundaries detected

    126

    Hard cuts / h

    7

    Clipping events

    607

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (13:00, 30:00, 34:00, 38:00, 45:00, 49:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 3:05Textural Handover
    • 7:15Groove Lock
    • 10:10Energy Shift
    • 26:45Groove Lock Achievement
    • 28:12Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Maintain the current level of rhythmic complexity.
    • Experiment with very subtle vocal textures to add a human element.
    • Continue to use long EQ blends to preserve the hypnotic state.
    • Continue exploring the intersection of broken-beat and hypnotic techno.
    • Experiment with slightly more melodic tension in the breakdowns.
    • Maintain the high level of technical precision in long blends.
    • Introduce a brief melodic or atmospheric 'reset' around the 108-minute mark to break the energy plateau.
    • Experiment with even longer, 128-bar transitions to further blur the lines between tracks.
    • Consider incorporating a field recording or non-musical texture to enhance the 'urban' atmosphere.
    • Introduce subtle melodic elements to provide emotional contrast to the industrial percussion.
    • Experiment with brief moments of total silence to heighten the impact of the rhythmic re-entry.
    • Incorporate a recognizable vocal hook to anchor the listener during the most abstract percussive passages.
    • Introduce a high-contrast melodic element to provide a brief emotional anchor.
    • Experiment with a 'hard cut' reset to release tension more dramatically.
    • Use a recognizable vocal snippet to ground the abstract rhythmic sections for a broader audience.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Ben UFO's Pitch Perfect 2023 EP.002 — Ben UFO get?
    Pitch Perfect 2023 EP.002 — Ben UFO scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Pitch Perfect 2023 EP.002 — Ben UFO?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 26m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 82/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Ben UFO sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    All Ben UFO analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.