Anyma — 2023 LIVE MELODIC TECHNO SET FT FROM THE LIKES OF ARGY ARTBAT ANYMA CAMELPHAT AND MORE

    Melodic Techno · 1h 11m · analysed 22 Jul 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    87/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 11m
    Genre
    Melodic Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Anyma.

    In short

    2023 LIVE MELODIC TECHNO SET FT FROM THE LIKES OF ARGY ARTBAT ANYMA CAMELPHAT AND MORE by Anyma scores 87/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (81/100).

    This DJ understands that in melodic techno, the space between the notes is as important as the notes themselves.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (6:00, 10:00, 35:00, 45:00, 52:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 02:08Measured (DSP)96/100Listen at 02:08

      Surgical precision. The transition is almost imperceptible, maintaining the hypnotic flow perfectly.

    • 05:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 05:45

      Smooth integration of the incoming lead synth. The EQ work prevents any frequency masking.

    • 09:42Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 09:42

      Excellent use of key compatibility to bridge two high-energy tracks. The energy handoff is seamless.

    • 14:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 14:12

      Perfectly executed handover. The incoming bassline is introduced subtly under the outgoing melody.

    • 18:55Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 18:55

      Used the breakdown of Track A to introduce the atmosphere of Track B. Very smooth.

    • 22:40Measured (DSP)76/100Listen at 22:40

      Slightly abrupt energy shift. The incoming track has a much brighter top-end that wasn't fully compensated for.

    • 24:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 24:15

      Flawless transition; the incoming bassline takes over naturally without any volume dip.

    • 28:30Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 28:30

      Smooth integration of synth layers; the transition feels like a single evolving track.

    About this melodic techno set

    2023 LIVE MELODIC TECHNO SET FT FROM THE LIKES OF ARGY ARTBAT ANYMA CAMELPHAT AND MORE is a melodic techno DJ set by Anyma, running 1h 11m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ understands that in melodic techno, the space between the notes is as important as the notes themselves.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 81/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 27 points, moving between 40 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 996.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This DJ understands that in melodic techno, the space between the notes is as important as the notes themselves.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision91
    Track selection88
    Energy arc76
    Crowd control84
    Harmonic depth93
    Groove patience90
    Creativity68
    Signature83

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured66
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Controlmeasured90
    Tempo Stabilitymeasured98
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI89
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI91
    Flow ContinuityAI95
    PayoffAI84

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%90
    Energy Curvemeasured91
    PacingAI93
    MomentumAI91
    Peak ManagementAI87
    Energy HandoffAI87
    Fatigue ControlAI82

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%81
    Unexpected MomentsAI75
    ContrastAI84
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI80
    FreshnessAI77
    Surprise ControlAI75

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%91
    Selection QualityAI90
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI91
    ConfidenceAI90
    RestraintAI90
    SignatureAI85

    Energy arc

    00:0058:30

    Transitions analysed (8)

    02:08

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap on phrase

    Surgical precision. The transition is almost imperceptible, maintaining the hypnotic flow perfectly.

    96
    05:45

    Filtered transition with melodic layering

    Smooth integration of the incoming lead synth. The EQ work prevents any frequency masking.

    88
    09:42

    Harmonic blend into breakdown

    Excellent use of key compatibility to bridge two high-energy tracks. The energy handoff is seamless.

    92
    14:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed handover. The incoming bassline is introduced subtly under the outgoing melody.

    92
    18:55

    Filter-assisted transition during breakdown

    Used the breakdown of Track A to introduce the atmosphere of Track B. Very smooth.

    85
    22:40

    Quick EQ swap

    Slightly abrupt energy shift. The incoming track has a much brighter top-end that wasn't fully compensated for.

    76
    24:15

    32-bar EQ blend, low swap on phrase

    Flawless transition; the incoming bassline takes over naturally without any volume dip.

    92
    28:30

    Long melodic overlap with high-pass filtering

    Smooth integration of synth layers; the transition feels like a single evolving track.

    85

    Technical subscores

    90

    EQ balance

    95

    Beat alignment

    85

    Energy control

    98

    Tempo stability

    88

    Loudness control

    93

    Musical coherence

    94

    Harmonic compatibility

    92

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    21 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    258 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    4,215

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    92

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    61

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    176

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (5×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (6:00, 10:00, 35:00, 45:00, 52:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 00:45Atmospheric Hook
    • 05:15Tension Peak
    • 10:30Melodic Payoff
    • 22:40Risky pressure or vibe dip
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Anyma's 2023 LIVE MELODIC TECHNO SET FT FROM THE LIKES OF ARGY ARTBAT ANYMA CAMELPHAT AND MORE get?
    2023 LIVE MELODIC TECHNO SET FT FROM THE LIKES OF ARGY ARTBAT ANYMA CAMELPHAT AND MORE scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is 2023 LIVE MELODIC TECHNO SET FT FROM THE LIKES OF ARGY ARTBAT ANYMA CAMELPHAT AND MORE?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 11m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 81/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Anyma sets analysed

    Similar melodic techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Anyma analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Upload your mix

    MP3 · WAV · AIFF · FLAC — max 200 MB

    Large WAV file? Export a 320 kbps MP3 for faster upload.