AnethaANETHA - RECORDED LIVE AT WAS. UTRECHT (09.03.24)

    Hard Techno · 1h 58m · analysed 21 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    84/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 58m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    About this hard techno set

    ANETHA - RECORDED LIVE AT WAS. UTRECHT (09.03.24) is a hard techno DJ set by Anetha, running 1h 58m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ's ability to layer percussive elements without cluttering the low-end is a hallmark of professional-level techno mixing.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 80/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 61 points, moving between 75 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 311.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 16 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    The DJ's ability to layer percussive elements without cluttering the low-end is a hallmark of professional-level techno mixing.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%80
    Beat Alignmentmeasured87
    Transition Qualitymeasured61
    Phrase Accuracymeasured91
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured87
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured93
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured49

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI85
    Section AwarenessAI88
    Flow ContinuityAI93
    PayoffAI93

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured82
    PacingAI89
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI89
    Energy HandoffAI91
    Fatigue ControlAI56

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI83
    ContrastAI81
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI89
    FreshnessAI53
    Surprise ControlAI83

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%93
    Selection QualityAI93
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI94
    ConfidenceAI95
    RestraintAI82
    SignatureAI94

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 86.

    Energy arc

    00:00118:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    02:15

    Long percussive blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed handover. The new kick takes over without any phase cancellation.

    92
    06:45

    EQ-based textural swap

    Smooth transition between two tracks with similar percussive energy but different mid-range textures.

    85
    13:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    17:20

    Minor Level Jump

    strategic_disruption

    82
    21:30

    Seamless Layering

    100
    26:30

    Fast EQ swap on 16-bar phrase

    Extremely tight handover of the low-end, maintaining the driving energy without a dip.

    92
    29:45

    Long percussive blend

    Smooth layering of two tracks for 32 bars, creating a complex rhythmic texture.

    85

    Technical subscores

    87

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    92

    Energy control

    93

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    83

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    15.5 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    165.6 ms

    Drift p95

    7,086

    Boundaries detected

    239

    Hard cuts / h

    98

    Clipping events

    511

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (06:45, 29:45).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (9:15, 32:00, 36:00, 40:00, 47:00, 52:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 04:30Groove Lock Achievement
    • 09:15Tension Peak
    • 25:15Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with more radical EQ cuts during layering to create rhythmic 'holes' for the crowd to breathe.
    • Incorporate a few tracks with distinct melodic hooks to provide emotional contrast.
    • Utilize the full stereo field for industrial FX to enhance the immersive club experience.
    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps to create larger tension-release cycles.
    • Incorporate occasional dissonant synth stabs to add emotional depth to the industrial groove.
    • Utilize brief moments of silence or near-silence to maximize the impact of the kick drum re-entry.
    • Continue to master the 'third track' effect through dense percussive layering.
    • Introduce more varied mid-range textures to prevent the industrial sound from becoming too linear.
    • Experiment with brief, high-pass filter resets to create 'breathing room' in the mix.
    • Utilize more dramatic stereo-width automation on percussion to enhance the immersive club feel.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Anetha's ANETHA - RECORDED LIVE AT WAS. UTRECHT (09.03.24) get?
    ANETHA - RECORDED LIVE AT WAS. UTRECHT (09.03.24) scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is ANETHA - RECORDED LIVE AT WAS. UTRECHT (09.03.24)?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 58m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 80/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Anetha sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    All Anetha analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.