Wreckno — Wreckno Radio Mix By C - Mac

    Bass House · 1h 12m · analysed 26 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    68/100
    Level
    developing
    Duration
    1h 12m
    Genre
    Bass House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Wreckno.

    In short

    Wreckno Radio Mix By C - Mac by Wreckno scores 68/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (82/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (67/100).

    The DJ uses spoken word as a narrative glue, turning a standard tech-house set into a more deliberate story.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Technical beatmatching
    • Thematic consistency
    • Low-end energy

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (3×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 3× (7:00, 10:45, 17:20).
    • Repeated volume jumps (3×) — Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 3× (7:00, 10:45, 21:50).
    • Repeated key clashes (2×) — Mismatched keys produce dissonance that drains energy from the floor. Detected 2× (10:45, 21:50).
    • Recurring phase misalignment (2×) — Beats drifting out of phase produce flammed kicks that read as sloppy. Detected 2× (10:45, 21:50).

    What to try next

    • Incorporate more melodic elements in the final 10 minutes to provide a narrative resolution.
    • Experiment with 'echo-out' or 'delay' effects during transitions to add atmospheric depth.
    • Vary the transition lengths; while long blends work well, a few sharp cuts could increase energy spikes.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:05Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 3:05

      Smooth transition, the percussive elements overlap perfectly without phasing.

    • 7:00Measured (DSP)72/100Listen at 7:00

      The energy jumps slightly too fast, creating a minor vibe zap.

    • 10:45Measured (DSP)65/100Listen at 10:45

      Audible EQ clash in the mid-range as two vocal elements fight for space.

    • 13:45Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 13:45

      Smooth transition, well-phased and beat-matched.

    • 17:20Measured (DSP)75/100Listen at 17:20

      Effective layering of percussive elements, though slightly crowded in the mids.

    • 21:50Measured (DSP)65/100Listen at 21:50

      Slight energy dip during the transition, recovery takes a few bars.

    About this bass house set

    Wreckno Radio Mix By C - Mac is a bass house DJ set by Wreckno, running 1h 12m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 68/100 overall — developing.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ uses spoken word as a narrative glue, turning a standard tech-house set into a more deliberate story.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 82/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 67/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 20 points, moving between 30 and 86 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 684.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 18 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The DJ uses spoken word as a narrative glue, turning a standard tech-house set into a more deliberate story.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured85
    Transition Qualitymeasured76
    Phrase Accuracymeasured81
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured80
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured88
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%73
    Narrative ArcAI76
    ProgressionAI70
    Tension & ReleaseAI68
    Section AwarenessAI74
    Flow ContinuityAI80
    PayoffAI73

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%69
    Energy Curvemeasured63
    PacingAI69
    MomentumAI81
    Peak ManagementAI68
    Energy HandoffAI73
    Fatigue ControlAI55

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%67
    Unexpected MomentsAI66
    ContrastAI63
    Transition Varietymeasured83
    Selection RiskAI62
    FreshnessAI54
    Surprise ControlAI66

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%75
    Selection QualityAI73
    Identity ConsistencyAI89
    IntentionalityAI73
    ConfidenceAI77
    RestraintAI68
    SignatureAI65

    Energy arc

    0:0072:00

    Transitions analysed (8)

    3:05

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Smooth transition, the percussive elements overlap perfectly without phasing.

    85
    7:00

    Quick mid-phrase swap

    The energy jumps slightly too fast, creating a minor vibe zap.

    72
    10:45

    Overlapping vocal blend

    Audible EQ clash in the mid-range as two vocal elements fight for space.

    65
    13:45

    EQ blend with low-end swap

    Smooth transition, well-phased and beat-matched.

    82
    17:20

    Long blend with mid-range layering

    Effective layering of percussive elements, though slightly crowded in the mids.

    75
    21:50

    Quick cut on the drop

    Slight energy dip during the transition, recovery takes a few bars.

    65
    25:15

    Perfect Blend

    100
    30:15

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82

    Technical subscores

    80

    EQ balance

    86

    Beat alignment

    76

    Energy control

    88

    Tempo stability

    79

    Loudness control

    80

    Musical coherence

    76

    Harmonic compatibility

    82

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    18 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    203 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    4,305

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    70

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    0

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    192

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 3× (7:00, 10:45, 17:20).

    • Repeated volume jumps

      Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 3× (7:00, 10:45, 21:50).

    • Repeated key clashes

      Mismatched keys produce dissonance that drains energy from the floor. Detected 2× (10:45, 21:50).

    • Recurring phase misalignment

      Beats drifting out of phase produce flammed kicks that read as sloppy. Detected 2× (10:45, 21:50).

    • Slow recovery after transitions

      Long perceptual recovery means the energy line dips on every blend. Detected 2× (7:00, 10:45).

    • Long static loops (1×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (4:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Technical beatmatching
    • Thematic consistency
    • Low-end energy

    Timeline

    • 0:45Atmospheric Hook
    • 5:30Energy Plateau
    • 11:15Vocal Mud
    • 7:00Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 10:45Transition / momentum break
    • 15:30Groove Lock
    • 22:10Energy Sag
    • 21:50Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Incorporate more melodic elements in the final 10 minutes to provide a narrative resolution.
    • Experiment with 'echo-out' or 'delay' effects during transitions to add atmospheric depth.
    • Vary the transition lengths; while long blends work well, a few sharp cuts could increase energy spikes.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Wreckno's Wreckno Radio Mix By C - Mac get?
    Wreckno Radio Mix By C - Mac scores 68/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Wreckno Radio Mix By C - Mac?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 12m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 82/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 67/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Wreckno sets analysed

    Similar bass house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Wreckno analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.