wAFF — NATURECAST 005: Di Chiara Brothers
House · 1h 02m · analysed 26 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, wAFF.
In short
NATURECAST 005: Di Chiara Brothers by wAFF scores 67/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (81/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (55/100).
The DJ's strength lies in their ability to maintain a relentless groove through precise technical execution.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Recurring mid-frequency clash (3×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 3× (5:15, 20:30, 29:10).
- Repeated volume jumps (3×) — Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 3× (5:15, 20:30, 29:10).
- Long static loops (4×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:00, 38:00, 41:00, 51:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Work on finer gain matching between tracks to avoid volume jumps.
- Incorporate more melodic elements to add narrative depth.
- Experiment with longer, more dramatic breakdowns to create higher tension.
- Use EQ more creatively to carve out space for overlapping percussive elements.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Smooth transition, perfectly phrase-aligned. The vocal hook from the incoming track is introduced at the ideal moment.
Slight level jump when the new track fully takes over, but the groove remains intact.
Excellent use of layering to build energy. The transition feels like a natural evolution of the track.
Textbook tech-house transition. The incoming kick replaces the outgoing one perfectly on the 32-bar phrase.
Smooth integration of a new percussive layer. The DJ uses filters well to avoid frequency masking.
Slightly abrupt transition compared to the previous ones, but maintains the groove well.
Perfectly executed transition that maintains the groove seamlessly.
Clean transition on the downbeat, though the incoming track is slightly louder.
About this house set
NATURECAST 005: Di Chiara Brothers is a house DJ set by wAFF, running 1h 02m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 67/100 overall — developing.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
The DJ's strength lies in their ability to maintain a relentless groove through precise technical execution.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 81/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 55/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 40 points, moving between 65 and 86 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
8 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1827.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 82 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The DJ's strength lies in their ability to maintain a relentless groove through precise technical execution.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%55
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%80
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%75
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%71
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%81
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (8)
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Smooth transition, perfectly phrase-aligned. The vocal hook from the incoming track is introduced at the ideal moment.
Mid-range focused blend
Slight level jump when the new track fully takes over, but the groove remains intact.
Percussive layering
Excellent use of layering to build energy. The transition feels like a natural evolution of the track.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Textbook tech-house transition. The incoming kick replaces the outgoing one perfectly on the 32-bar phrase.
Mid-range layering and filter fade
Smooth integration of a new percussive layer. The DJ uses filters well to avoid frequency masking.
Quick EQ swap
Slightly abrupt transition compared to the previous ones, but maintains the groove well.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly executed transition that maintains the groove seamlessly.
Phrase-aligned cut with EQ adjustment
Clean transition on the downbeat, though the incoming track is slightly louder.
Technical subscores
85
EQ balance
91
Beat alignment
82
Energy control
92
Tempo stability
83
Loudness control
86
Musical coherence
85
Harmonic compatibility
87
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
82 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
220 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,710
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
166
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
253
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
282
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Recurring mid-frequency clash
Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 3× (5:15, 20:30, 29:10).
Repeated volume jumps
Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 3× (5:15, 20:30, 29:10).
Long static loops (4×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:00, 38:00, 41:00, 51:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 2:08Vocal Hook Entry
- 5:15Level Jump
- 15:20Groove Lock Peak
- 19:45Subtle Energy Sag
- 20:30Risky pressure or vibe dip
- 22:45Groove Lock
- 27:15Energy Plateau
Coaching notes
- Work on finer gain matching between tracks to avoid volume jumps.
- Incorporate more melodic elements to add narrative depth.
- Experiment with longer, more dramatic breakdowns to create higher tension.
- Use EQ more creatively to carve out space for overlapping percussive elements.
- Use more dramatic EQ cuts during transitions to create 'pops' of energy.
- Incorporate tracks with more distinct melodic hooks to improve emotional engagement.
- Experiment with shorter, more aggressive transitions to vary the pace.
- Utilize FX like delay and reverb to create more atmospheric depth during breakdowns.
- Introduce more melodic elements to add emotional depth.
- Experiment with more creative transition techniques like looping or filtering.
- Create more pronounced peaks and valleys in the energy arc.
- Incorporate tracks with more distinctive artistic signatures.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does wAFF's NATURECAST 005: Di Chiara Brothers get?
- NATURECAST 005: Di Chiara Brothers scores 67/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is NATURECAST 005: Di Chiara Brothers?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 02m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 81/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 55/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More wAFF sets analysed
Similar house sets
- Joeski — Joeski Live @ Stereobar Montreal Canada 05.13.23 Part 268
- Detlef — Detlef for Escape Halloween Virtual Rave-A-Thon (October 31, 2020)69
- John Summit — John Summit Pop Up Set at Vail Mountain Colorado70
- Mike Dunn — Electrifikation70
- Doc Martin — Sunday Club Classics 08 - 18 - 2473
- Doc Martin — Doc Martin SXM Festival Mix Live mix74
- Derrick Carter — Lost In Bass 483: DERRICK CARTER & JO MINEAULT60
- Dennis Ferrer — Dennis Ferrer - BPM Festival 2014 (Mamitas, Playa Del Carmen)76
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research