Solomun — Christmas In Bed 2024

    Melodic Techno · 1h 02m · analysed 18 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    68/100
    Level
    developing
    Duration
    1h 02m
    Genre
    Melodic Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Solomun.

    In short

    Christmas In Bed 2024 by Solomun scores 68/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (83/100) and the weakest is ENERGY (71/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:00, 35:00, 41:00, 46:45, 55:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Use high-pass filters to create tension before dropping the bass back in.
    • Experiment with shorter, more aggressive transitions to inject energy.
    • Incorporate tracks with more distinct melodic hooks to break the percussive loop.
    • Monitor the energy plateau and ensure the mix doesn't stay static for more than 3 minutes.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 6:32Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 6:32

      Perfectly executed transition where the incoming bassline replaces the outgoing one without any phase cancellation or volume dip.

    • 10:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 10:45

      Smooth integration of the incoming bassline; phrase alignment is spot on.

    • 14:22Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 14:22

      Effective transition, though the incoming track is slightly louder in the high-mids.

    • 18:50Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 18:50

      Well-timed low-end handover that maintains the momentum perfectly.

    • 24:15Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 24:15

      Smooth transition with well-managed low-end handover.

    • 28:45Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 28:45

      Clean transition, though the incoming track is very similar in energy.

    About this melodic techno set

    Christmas In Bed 2024 is a melodic techno DJ set by Solomun, running 1h 02m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 68/100 overall — developing.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 83/100; the weakest is ENERGY at 71/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 30 points, moving between 20 and 70 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 741.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured83
    Phrase Accuracymeasured84
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured80
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured88
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%75
    Narrative ArcAI80
    ProgressionAI73
    Tension & ReleaseAI69
    Section AwarenessAI77
    Flow ContinuityAI82
    PayoffAI66

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%71
    Energy Curvemeasured70
    PacingAI76
    MomentumAI79
    Peak ManagementAI70
    Energy HandoffAI72
    Fatigue ControlAI43

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%72
    Unexpected MomentsAI70
    ContrastAI75
    Transition Varietymeasured84
    Selection RiskAI72
    FreshnessAI44
    Surprise ControlAI70

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%81
    Selection QualityAI77
    Identity ConsistencyAI90
    IntentionalityAI78
    ConfidenceAI79
    RestraintAI84
    SignatureAI71

    Energy arc

    0:0061:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    6:32

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap on phrase

    Perfectly executed transition where the incoming bassline replaces the outgoing one without any phase cancellation or volume dip.

    95
    10:45

    Long EQ blend

    Smooth integration of the incoming bassline; phrase alignment is spot on.

    85
    14:22

    Mid-frequency swap

    Effective transition, though the incoming track is slightly louder in the high-mids.

    78
    18:50

    Bass swap on the drop

    Well-timed low-end handover that maintains the momentum perfectly.

    82
    24:15

    Long EQ blend

    Smooth transition with well-managed low-end handover.

    85
    28:45

    Mid-frequency swap

    Clean transition, though the incoming track is very similar in energy.

    78

    Technical subscores

    80

    EQ balance

    87

    Beat alignment

    74

    Energy control

    88

    Tempo stability

    78

    Loudness control

    79

    Musical coherence

    84

    Harmonic compatibility

    83

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    208 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,676

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    8

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    209

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    364

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (5×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:00, 35:00, 41:00, 46:45, 55:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:45Atmospheric Hook
    • 5:20Groove Lock
    • 12:15Groove Lock
    • 16:30Energy Plateau
    • 25:30Energy Plateau
    • 29:15Solid Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Use high-pass filters to create tension before dropping the bass back in.
    • Experiment with shorter, more aggressive transitions to inject energy.
    • Incorporate tracks with more distinct melodic hooks to break the percussive loop.
    • Monitor the energy plateau and ensure the mix doesn't stay static for more than 3 minutes.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Solomun's Christmas In Bed 2024 get?
    Christmas In Bed 2024 scores 68/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Christmas In Bed 2024?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 02m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 83/100, while ENERGY is the lowest at 71/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Solomun sets analysed

    Similar melodic techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Solomun analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…