Solomun — Christmas In Bed 2019

    Melodic Techno · 1h 02m · analysed 18 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    68/100
    Level
    developing
    Duration
    1h 02m
    Genre
    Melodic Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Solomun.

    In short

    Christmas In Bed 2019 by Solomun scores 68/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (83/100) and the weakest is ENERGY (67/100).

    Your technical execution is pro-level, but your storytelling needs more 'chapters' to keep a dancefloor fully engaged.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Technical transition cleanliness
    • Stylistic consistency
    • Patience and restraint

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (1×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (15:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Maintain the excellent narrative focus.
    • Experiment with more creative transition techniques.
    • Introduce more rhythmic variation to keep the energy dynamic.
    • Explore darker emotional textures for added contrast.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:05Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 3:05

      Seamless introduction of the next track's groove, perfectly aligned.

    • 5:42Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 5:42

      Smooth layering of synth elements, maintaining the hypnotic flow.

    • 8:30Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 8:30

      Clean transition with well-managed low-end swap.

    • 10:45Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 10:45

      Smooth integration of the incoming percussion loop over the outgoing bassline.

    • 14:20Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 14:20

      Perfectly timed low-end handover that maintains the groove without a dip.

    • 19:15Measured (DSP)65/100Listen at 19:15

      Slightly abrupt mid-range entry that momentarily clutters the mix.

    • 24:15Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 24:15

      Very smooth transition, almost imperceptible track change.

    • 28:15Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 28:15

      Clean integration of the incoming track's melodic elements.

    About this melodic techno set

    Christmas In Bed 2019 is a melodic techno DJ set by Solomun, running 1h 02m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 68/100 overall — developing.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Your technical execution is pro-level, but your storytelling needs more 'chapters' to keep a dancefloor fully engaged.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 83/100; the weakest is ENERGY at 67/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 25 points, moving between 30 and 75 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 866.9 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 12 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    Your technical execution is pro-level, but your storytelling needs more 'chapters' to keep a dancefloor fully engaged.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured91
    Transition Qualitymeasured80
    Phrase Accuracymeasured80
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured78
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured87
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%71
    Narrative ArcAI77
    ProgressionAI69
    Tension & ReleaseAI64
    Section AwarenessAI73
    Flow ContinuityAI78
    PayoffAI63

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%67
    Energy Curvemeasured70
    PacingAI69
    MomentumAI75
    Peak ManagementAI64
    Energy HandoffAI70
    Fatigue ControlAI39

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%68
    Unexpected MomentsAI66
    ContrastAI70
    Transition Varietymeasured85
    Selection RiskAI56
    FreshnessAI54
    Surprise ControlAI66

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%76
    Selection QualityAI73
    Identity ConsistencyAI89
    IntentionalityAI72
    ConfidenceAI72
    RestraintAI79
    SignatureAI66

    Energy arc

    0:0052:00

    Transitions analysed (8)

    3:05

    32-bar EQ blend, low swap on phrase

    Seamless introduction of the next track's groove, perfectly aligned.

    92
    5:42

    Long melodic blend

    Smooth layering of synth elements, maintaining the hypnotic flow.

    85
    8:30

    EQ-focused frequency handover

    Clean transition with well-managed low-end swap.

    88
    10:45

    Long EQ blend

    Smooth integration of the incoming percussion loop over the outgoing bassline.

    82
    14:20

    Bass swap on phrase

    Perfectly timed low-end handover that maintains the groove without a dip.

    88
    19:15

    Quick EQ transition

    Slightly abrupt mid-range entry that momentarily clutters the mix.

    65
    24:15

    Long EQ blend, swapping lows at the phrase change.

    Very smooth transition, almost imperceptible track change.

    85
    28:15

    32-bar blend with gradual high-end introduction.

    Clean integration of the incoming track's melodic elements.

    82

    Technical subscores

    78

    EQ balance

    85

    Beat alignment

    72

    Energy control

    87

    Tempo stability

    76

    Loudness control

    76

    Musical coherence

    82

    Harmonic compatibility

    81

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    12 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    240 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,722

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    16

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    219

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    393

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (1×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (15:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Technical transition cleanliness
    • Stylistic consistency
    • Patience and restraint

    Timeline

    • 0:00Atmospheric Opening
    • 3:05Seamless Groove Entry
    • 7:30Melodic Peak
    • 19:15Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 24:15Seamless Handoff
    • 26:30Energy Plateau

    Coaching notes

    • Maintain the excellent narrative focus.
    • Experiment with more creative transition techniques.
    • Introduce more rhythmic variation to keep the energy dynamic.
    • Explore darker emotional textures for added contrast.
    • Incorporate more dynamic EQ work (e.g., filtering out the kick for 4 bars) to create mini-tensions.
    • Experiment with tracks that have more distinct melodic hooks to increase memorability.
    • Vary the transition lengths; while long blends are great for deep house, a few quicker swaps can inject energy.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Solomun's Christmas In Bed 2019 get?
    Christmas In Bed 2019 scores 68/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Christmas In Bed 2019?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 02m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 83/100, while ENERGY is the lowest at 67/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Solomun sets analysed

    Similar melodic techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Solomun analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.