Solardo — Solardo Live @ Elrow Ibiza 24.06.24
Tech House · 1h 29m · analysed 21 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Solardo.
In short
Solardo Live @ Elrow Ibiza 24.06.24 by Solardo scores 69/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (85/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (55/100).
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 9:00, 17:00, 24:00, 30:00, 36:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Introduce more melodic elements to provide emotional contrast to the percussive drive.
- Experiment with longer build-ups to maximize the impact of the drops.
- Incorporate subtle FX or atmospheric layers to enhance the narrative depth.
- Use more creative EQ filtering during transitions to create unique textures.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Smooth transition maintaining the percussive drive. The low-end swap is perfectly timed on the phrase.
Effective use of high-pass filtering to bring in the new track's percussion before swapping the bass.
Flawless transition, the new bassline takes over perfectly on the phrase.
Effective use of high-pass filter to clear space for the incoming track's kick.
Smooth integration of the new track's percussion over the existing groove.
Perfectly executed transition; the new bassline takes over without any phase issues.
Smooth integration of a vocal loop over the outgoing track's percussion.
About this tech house set
Solardo Live @ Elrow Ibiza 24.06.24 is a tech house DJ set by Solardo, running 1h 29m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 69/100 overall — developing.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 85/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 55/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 41 points, moving between 70 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 2573.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 202 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%55
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%84
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%79
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%76
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%85
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Smooth transition maintaining the percussive drive. The low-end swap is perfectly timed on the phrase.
Filter-assisted blend
Effective use of high-pass filtering to bring in the new track's percussion before swapping the bass.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Flawless transition, the new bassline takes over perfectly on the phrase.
Filter sweep and quick swap
Effective use of high-pass filter to clear space for the incoming track's kick.
32-bar blend with mid-range layering
Smooth integration of the new track's percussion over the existing groove.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly executed transition; the new bassline takes over without any phase issues.
Percussive layering
Smooth integration of a vocal loop over the outgoing track's percussion.
Technical subscores
86
EQ balance
91
Beat alignment
85
Energy control
92
Tempo stability
85
Loudness control
85
Musical coherence
84
Harmonic compatibility
88
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
202 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
203 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
5,344
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
226
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
5
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
342
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 9:00, 17:00, 24:00, 30:00, 36:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 5:45Vocal Energy Peak
- 9:12Rhythmic Layering
- 25:30Vocal Hook Integration
- 30:10Percussive Build-up
Coaching notes
- Introduce more melodic elements to provide emotional contrast to the percussive drive.
- Experiment with longer build-ups to maximize the impact of the drops.
- Incorporate subtle FX or atmospheric layers to enhance the narrative depth.
- Use more creative EQ filtering during transitions to create unique textures.
- Use more aggressive high-pass filtering during builds to increase tension.
- Experiment with layering a third percussive element to thicken the groove.
- Consider a slightly more melodic final track to leave a lasting emotional impression.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Solardo's Solardo Live @ Elrow Ibiza 24.06.24 get?
- Solardo Live @ Elrow Ibiza 24.06.24 scores 69/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Solardo Live @ Elrow Ibiza 24.06.24?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 29m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 85/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 55/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Solardo sets analysed
Similar tech house sets
- Ilario Alicante — Ilario Alicante Space Miami 2-21-2670
- Jamie Jones — Hot Robot Radio 24868
- Jamie Jones — Hot Robot Radio 25068
- Jamie Jones — Hot Robot Radio 23467
- Jamie Jones — Hot Robot Radio 24775
- Jamie Jones — Hot Robot Radio 25276
- Jamie Jones — Hot Robot Radio 23378
- Chris Lake — Chris Lake LIVE from Brooklyn Storehouse 2025 _ Chemistry Release Weekend [mHp7y-9oKOk]60
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research